O C L C
N E W S L E T T E R
N O V E M B E R / D E C E M B E R 2 0 0 1 I S S N : 0 1 6 3 - 8 9 8 X N O . 2 5 4
November/ December 2001 No. 254
Editor in chief:
Nita Dean . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . nita_ dean@ oclc. org
Editor:
George Promenschenkel . . . . . . . promensg@ oclc. org
Assistant Editors:
Bob Murphy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . bob_ murphy@ oclc. org
Christopher Barton . . . . . . . . . . . . . bartonc@ oclc. org
Editorial Assistant:
Jennifer Hamilton . . . . . . . jennifer_ hamilton@ oclc. org
Cover Design: Linda Shepard
Art Production: Tammy Miller
Desktop Publishing: Lithokraft II
All photos taken by Rich Skopin unless
otherwise noted.
OCLC is an Equal Opportunity Employer, treating its
employees and applicants equitably without regard to
race, color, religion, sex, age, national origin, handicap,
sexual orientation, or marital status.
OCLC Newsletter ( ISSN: 0163- 898X) is published by
OCLC Online Computer Library Center, Incorporated,
6565 Frantz Road, Dublin, Ohio 43017- 3395.
Contents of this newsletter may be reproduced in whole
or in part provided that credit is given.
OCLC Newsletter is distributed free. Direct subscription
inquiries and changes of address to: Newsletter
Subscriptions, OCLC, MC104, 6565 Frantz Road,
Dublin, Ohio 43017- 3395.
OCLC Newsletter is also available via OCLC’s home
page on the World Wide Web [ www. oclc. org] under
“ News” or directly at URL:
http:// www. oclc. org/ news/ newsletter/
All products and services named are trademarks or ser-vice
marks of their respective companies.
ArticleFirst, AsiaLink, ContentsFirst, DDC, Dewey, Dewey
Decimal Classification, FirstSearch, Forest Press,
NetFirst, OCLC, PromptCat, TechPro and WorldCat are
registered trademarks of OCLC Online Computer Library
Center, Incorporated.
Access Suite, CatME, Cataloging MicroEnhancer, CORC,
Dublin Core, Electronic Collections Online, Union Lists of
Periodicals and WebDewey are trademarks of OCLC
Online Computer Library Center, Incorporated.
Contact Information:
OCLC, Dublin, Ohio . . . . . . . . . . . . + 1- 614- 764- 6000
OCLC, Dublin, Ohio,
from the U. S. and Canada . . . . . . . . . 1- 800- 848- 5878
Asia Pacific area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . + 1- 614- 764- 6189
Dublin, Ohio. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . asia_ pacific@ oclc. org
Latin America and the Caribbean . . + 1- 614- 761- 5196
Dublin, Ohio . . . . . . . . . . . . . america_ latina@ oclc. org
OCLC Canada . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . + 1- 888- 658- 6583
Chambly, Quebec . . . . . . . . . . . . . . canada@ oclc. org
OCLC Europe,
the Middle East & Africa . . . . . . . + 44 - 121- 456- 4656
Birmingham, United Kingdom . . . . . . europe@ oclc. org
OCLC User and Network Support . . . 1- 800- 848- 5800
OCLC, a nonprofit membership organi-zation,
is engaged in computer library
service and research.
Correspondents:
Robert C. Bolander
Kay Covert
Libbie Crawford
Diane Vizine- Goetz
Shirley Hyatt
Dawn Lawson
Hans- Jörg Lieder
Joan S. Mitchell
Winston Tabb
C O N T E N T S
Membership News
OCLC Members Council welcomes new delegates, discusses partnerships
in building the worldwide library cooperative
Team effort results in 48 millionth WorldCat record for
Southern Illinois University
Sacred Heart Major Seminary makes 111 millionth OCLC ILL request
OCLC Marketing vice president named
OCLC makes offer to purchase assets of netLibrary
MALVINE and LEAF projects promote library sharing in Europe
Third ARL/ OCLC Strategic Issues Forum scheduled for February
OCLC Language Sets expanded
OCLC meetings at ALA Midwinter 2002
OCLC Institute to host seminars at ALA Midwinter
OCLC Institute to present “ Steering by Standards” videoconference series
OCLC Canada staff settled in new office
OCLC Canada and the CLA announce Northern Exposure to Leadership
Institute Award winner
OCLC Statistics
Ingram Library Services and OCLC to provide prerelease video cataloging
information
OCLC to collaborate with National Library of Australia to provide gateway
to WorldCat for small libraries
WorldCat now contains more than 500,000 records for digital resources
“ Ohio Dinners for Spectrum” raises funds, consciousness
Research
OCLC researchers find slowdown in web growth
Dublin Core Metadata Element Set approved
as ANSI Standard Z39.85- 2001
Kathleen Braverman discusses the impact of linguistic dialects
on the workplace
Dewey Research: New Uses for the DDC
Dewey turns 125
Dewey Decimal Classification: 125 and still growing
Dewey’s 125th anniversary celebrated at IFLA
The Library of Congress and the DDC
You’ve come a long way, Dewey!
People, Places & Things introduced
Product News
OCLC announces enhancements to WorldCat in FirstSearch
Enhancements to OCLC ArticleFirst
Alibris/ WorldCat link first of many planned
Offline services automate routine cataloging tasks
OCLC offers OpenURL option for libraries
Internet lists deliver news to the desktop
News briefs and links
48 Can this marriage be saved?
45
44
43
42
41
39
38
36
34
32
30
27
24
21
19
18
17
16
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
4
MAKING DEWEY
“ EVER MORE WIDELY USEFUL”
F R O M J A Y J O R D A N
A s we celebrate the 125th anniversary
of the Dewey Decimal Classification
system in this issue of the OCLC
Newsletter, a bit of history is in order.
Melvil Dewey created his innovative
classification system in 1873 and first
published it in 1876. He established Forest
Press in 1911 to edit, publish and distribute
the classification. Since then, the system has
been continuously revised and expanded
through numerous editions.
From the beginning, Melvil Dewey was
very particular about the care and feeding of
his creation. In 1924, when he transferred
the copyrights for the DDC to Forest Press
and the Lake Placid Foundation, he stipulated
that this endeavor should “ never become a
mere money- making corporation.”
As a result, in 1988, when the Lake Placid
Education Foundation approached OCLC
about acquiring the rights to the DDC, the
parties had to get approval from the New
York Supreme Court. Mr. Dewey had also
expressed the wish that revenues from the
DDC should be employed to make the
system,“ ever more widely useful.”
Since OCLC Forest Press came into being
in 1988, there have been 20th and 21st
editions of the DDC, 12th and 13th abridged
editions, and three electronic versions. The
DDC has been translated into 30 languages.
It is now in use in over 200,000 libraries in
135 countries. It is truly a global resource
for librarians and library users. The DDC
has indeed come a long way, and yet, it is
apparent that we have just begun to tap
its usefulness.
On this 125th anniversary, I would like to
thank and acknowledge the generations of
editors and librarians who have continued to
make the DDC a dynamic, living classification
tool. I would also like to congratulate Joan
Mitchell, the OCLC Forest Press staff and
the current editorial staff at the Library
of Congress on this anniversary. Their
leadership and dedication continue
to make the DDC “ ever more widely useful.”
Mr. Dewey would be very proud indeed.
Jay Jordan
President and Chief Executive Officer
OCLC
The OCLC Members Council welcomed new dele-gates
from six countries and discussed plans,
directions and partnerships in building the world-wide
library cooperative Oct. 7– 9 at OCLC in
Dublin, Ohio.
It was the first of three regularly scheduled
three- day meetings for the 2001/ 02 Members
Council term with the dual themes of “ OCLC
Strategic Plans and Business Directions” and
“ Old Friends and New Partners: Building the
Worldwide Library Cooperative.”
OCLC Members Council was formerly known
as the OCLC Users Council. Under bylaws
adopted May 21, the Users Council changed its
name to Members Council and added six new del-egates
from outside the United States to better
define its role in strategic planning and extend
global representation.
Members Council welcomed new delegates
from the Netherlands, Japan, South Africa, France,
Mexico and China who will serve for the next
three years while a group of representatives from
council, the OCLC Board of Trustees, regional net-works
and service centers continue work on a
new policy to help define new standards for
membership and council representation.
“ Our goal is to reach into the international
community and enhance the meaning of OCLC as
a global library membership cooperative,” said
Jerry Stephens, OCLC Members Council president
and librarian and director, Mervyn H. Sterne
Library, University of Alabama– Birmingham, in his
opening remarks. “ Similar to the first meeting of
Users Council
23 years ago, we
are embarking
on an expanded
partnership,
one in which
Members Council
will play an even
more significant
role as we move
upstream in
the planning
process.”
Dr. Stephens
pointed out that
15 percent of
2001/ 02 Members Council delegates are from
outside the United States. “ The events of
September 11 made some people think twice
about traveling internationally,” said Dr. Stephens.
“ Some of our international delegates told me that
they thought it was particularly important to be
here because this is an important group doing
important work for the world’s libraries.”
Featured speaker Robert A. Simpkins, founder
and president of Global Crosswinds, an interna-tional
advisory and training firm, discussed
“ Global Partnerships and Communications.” Mr.
Simpkins explained that borders are not what
divide people; a lack of understanding of value
systems and cultures causes the greatest difficulty
in communication among people around the
world. He said people cannot be successful build-ing
global partnerships if they make decisions
and judgments based on their own beliefs and val-ues
without considering others.’
“ You cannot adopt another person’s culture,”
said Mr. Simpkins. “ You don’t have that lifetime of
experience that goes into developing those cul-tural
values. But you can adapt to it by learning
about other cultures and gaining a better under-standing
of the values other people hold.
“ If you understand what other people need to
feel successful, then you will significantly
improve your communication and improve your
international alliances,” he continued.
Mr. Simpkins concluded his remarks with a
plea to OCLC Members Council to “ keep helping
the diverse and wonderful people of this world
cut through the information to get the knowledge
they require to make wise choices.”
“ We at OCLC join the people of the world in
offering condolences to those affected by the ter-rorist
attacks of September 11,” said Jay Jordan,
OCLC president and CEO, in his OCLC President’s
Report. “ Like you in your libraries and institu-tions,
we must keep doing our jobs while trying
to comprehend and cope.
“ Our library network links over 40,000 institu-tions
in 76 countries, and together we serve mil-lions
of people,” Mr. Jordan continued. ��� Our global
cooperative has been built on trust and coopera-tion
and the shared belief in the importance of
organizing and preserving the world��s information
and passing it on to future generations. Surely,
M E M B E R S H I P N E W S
4 OCLC Newsletter November/ December 2001
OCLC Members Council welcomes new delegates,
discusses partnerships in building the worldwide
library cooperative
“ Type of Library” and “ Interest Group” sessions allow Members Council
delegates to focus on issues important in their libraries and specialities.
M E M B E R S H I P N E W S
OCLC Newsletter November/ December 2001 5
those beliefs will help to sustain us as we both
remember and move forward.”
Mr. Jordan updated delegates on OCLC activi-ties
and services, including initiatives from the
new OCLC Digital and Preservation Services
group. “ Under the leadership of Meg Bellinger,
president of OCLC Preservation Resources, this
group is launching three major initiatives to help
you bridge the digital divide and transform your
library’s resources into digital collections,” said Mr.
Jordan. “ In short, OCLC is providing a complete,
integrated solution for managing digital content.”
Phyllis B. Spies, vice president, OCLC
Worldwide Library Services, spoke about OCLC’s
commitment to removing barriers to international
resource sharing. Ms. Spies described OCLC
initiatives to bring library collections to the web;
move WorldCat to a Unicode- compliant platform;
implement gateways to major international union
catalogs; and continue to build community among
libraries around the world thereby increasing the
success of global resource sharing.
“ Resource sharing in the broadest sense is con-cerned
with building an infrastructure that
enables end users to locate and obtain materials
of interest in both print and digital formats,” said
Ms. Spies. “ Significant challenges to international
resource sharing exist today. It will take a con-certed
effort by many organizations around the
world to eliminate these barriers. OCLC is deeply
committed to helping to realize this dream.”
Extending WorldCat is a major part of OCLC’s
plan to increase membership and participation.
Lynn Kellar, director, OCLC Enterprise Database
Technology, briefed delegates on progress in
extending WorldCat to a new technological plat-form—
Oracle database technology— that will sup-port
Unicode, facilitate linking to international
repositories and make it possible to provide text,
graphics, sound and motion in the database.
“ Strengthening WorldCat strengthens the coop-erative,”
said Pat Stevens, director, OCLC Product
Management, who spoke about extending the
OCLC cooperative. “ Extending WorldCat has pro-found
positive implications for collaboration
worldwide.”
Members Council continued discussions on
OCLC membership and values. Mary- Alice Lynch,
executive director, Nylink, and chair of the board-appointed
Ad Hoc Committee on Membership,
sought input and suggestions from delegates on
drafting new definitions of membership and con-tribution,
and recommendations for a new for-mula
for allocating delegates to the Members
Council. Bob Seal, university librarian, Mary
Couts Burnett Library, Texas Christian University,
and chair of the Members Council Committee on
Principles of Membership, led a discussion of
membership issues facing the council. Delegates
will continue discussions on membership issues
through the 2001/ 02 term.
Delegates met in “ type- of- library” discussion
groups including Community College and
Academic Libraries; Consortia; Federal, State and
Special Libraries; Large Research Libraries; Private
Academic Libraries; Public Libraries; and State
Academic Libraries. These groups came together
to discuss library environments and services that
might be needed in the next three to five years.
“ This was added to our agenda to help us identify
areas of interest for the future,” said Dr. Stephens.
“ It’s part of our effort to move Members Council
more upstream in the strategic decision- making
process.”
Delegates also met in interest group discussions
focusing on Collections and Technical Services,
Cooperative Reference, Member Services and
Global Librarianship, Preservation/ Electronic
Collections, Research, and Resource Sharing.
George Needham, vice president, OCLC
Member Services, led discussion in a Members’
Forum to conclude the meeting.
The next regularly scheduled Members Council
meeting is Feb. 10– 12, 2002.
Minutes from the October 2001 meeting are
available on the OCLC Members Council web site
< http:// www. oclc. org/ oclc/ uc/>.
The Members Council supports OCLC’s mis-sion
by serving as a key discussion forum and
communications link between member libraries,
regional networks and other partners, and OCLC
management. By providing a channel for recom-mendations
and questions from Members Council
delegates, approving changes in the Code of
Regulations, and electing six members of the
Board of Trustees, Members Council helps shape
the future direction of OCLC.
• • •
M E M B E R S H I P N E W S
6 OCLC Newsletter November/ December 2001
Southern Illinois University at Carbondale entered
the 48 millionth bibliographic record into
WorldCat ( the OCLC Online Union Catalog) on
Sept. 20.
The record, for a dissertation titled,
“ Maintaining Purity: a Critical Ethnography on
the Performativity of Whiteness in an
Introductory Performance Studies Course,” by
John T. Warren, is the third gold record cataloged
at the university’s Delyte W. Morris Library.
Jim Chervinko, head of Original Cataloging,
said he used the OCLC Cataloging Micro
Enhancer ( CatME) for Windows software to cata-log
the 48 millionth record. CatME for Windows
combines interactive and batch cataloging in one
user- friendly interface.
Mr. Chervinko said he could not have done it
without the help of his colleagues, Karin
McClure, a video cataloger, and Daren Callahan,
head of Cataloging. That team effort resulted in
achieving the 48 millionth record.
��� A good strategy is to be aware of the numbers
and be in the right place at the right time when a
millionth record is approaching,” Mr. Chervinko
said. “ Patience is another strategy, because you
can’t put the records in too quickly.”
Mr. Chervinko printed the record and showed
it to everyone on his floor, including Keith
VanCleave, who hit the 30 millionth record in
WorldCat on March 22, 1994. On Dec. 16, 1981,
the university logged the 8 millionth biblio-graphic
record.
Southern Illinois University at Carbondale
( OCLC symbol SOI) is located about 100 miles
southeast of St. Louis, Missouri, in the extreme
southern part of Illinois. The university has an
enrollment of 23,000. The Delyte W. Morris
Library, which holds approximately 2.6 million
volumes, is a member of ILLINET.
Morris Library is planning to renovate and
add 50,000 square feet to its seven- story building.
Morris Library employs three professional
catalogers and nine library technicians. Two
new special collections to be cataloged
include approximately 3,000 items from the
recently acquired Spanish Civil War collection
and the archives from the Open Court Publishing
Company.
• • •
Team effort results in 48 millionth WorldCat record
for Southern Illinois University
The Cataloging Department at Southern Illinois University at Carbondale entered the 48 millionth bibliographic record into
WorldCat on Sept. 20. Members of the staff include: ( back row, left to right) Jeff Gibbens, Gary Beer, Katia Roberto, Bryan
Fagan, Jim Chervinko ( who entered the record), Vern Cornell, ( front row) Gabriella Unger, Jessica Maes, Daren Callahan,
Karin McClure and Donna Johnson.
photo provided by Southern Illinois University at Carbondale
M E M B E R S H I P N E W S
OCLC Newsletter November/ December 2001 7
The Sacred Heart Major Seminary Library in
Detroit, Michigan, entered the 111 millionth
request on the OCLC Interlibrary Loan ( ILL)
service on Sept. 20.
The request was for a book, Divine Meaning:
Studies in Patristic Hermeneutics, by Thomas
Forsyth Torrance. The request was filled the next
day by Cornerstone University Library ( OCLC
symbol: EXB), in Grand Rapids, Michigan.
“ I had no idea we were coming up on a mil-lionth
request,” said Norma Forbes, Interlibrary
Loan coordinator at the library. “ I was very sur-prised
when OCLC called to let me know it was
the 111 millionth.”
Named in honor of a former archbishop of
Detroit, the Edmund Cardinal Szoka Library ( ESJ)
is the graduate and undergraduate library for
Sacred Heart Major Seminary. SHMS is a Roman
Catholic seminary that prepares candidates for
the Roman Catholic priesthood and prepares men
and women for the deaconate, lay ministry and
other leadership roles. Located in the heart of
Detroit, the Cardinal Szoka Library is designed
specifically to meet the needs of the SHMS cur-riculum.
The Library also serves an extended
community of clergy, parishes, staff from the
Archdiocese of Detroit and religious scholars
throughout Michigan and beyond via a paid
membership service.
The library collections at Sacred
Heart Major Seminary have a long
and rich history. The original col-lection
began in 1921 with the
building of SHMS. In 1988, St.
John’s Provisional Seminary was
closed, and the graduate theology
program and library were moved
to Sacred Heart. With both a col-lege
and a graduate program, the
seminary was granted university
status and became a “ Major” semi-nary.
The graduate library was
moved into a space that was reno-vated
and specifically designed for
this use.
The Edmund Cardinal Szoka
Library holdings include 110,000
books, more than 17,600 bound
periodicals, 500 journal subscrip-tions,
and audio and video cassette
collections, making it the largest
theological collection in the state of
Michigan.
The University of Texas
Southwestern Medical Center at
Dallas Library entered the 110 mil-lionth
OCLC ILL request on Aug. 6.
• • •
Sacred Heart Major Seminary makes
111 millionth OCLC ILL request
Catherine De Rosa has been named vice presi-dent,
Corporate Marketing, by Jay Jordan, pres-ident
and chief executive officer, OCLC. She
began serving in this newly created position
on Nov. 1.
“ Cathy has an outstanding record of turning
ideas into innovative products,” said Mr.
Jordan. “ Her extensive background in technol-ogy
and e- business marketing will serve OCLC
well as we extend our services on a global
basis.”
Most recently, Ms. De Rosa served on the
faculty of the Fisher College of Business, Ohio
State University, where she taught e- business
marketing. From 1994 to 2000, she was vice
president and general manager, Symix Systems,
Columbus, Ohio. ( In 2001, Symix changed its
name to FrontStep.) From 1991 to 1993, she
was project manager, international pricing task
force, National Semiconductor. From 1989 to
1990, she was a senior consultant with Price
Waterhouse, serving technology companies in
Boston, Massachusetts, and San Jose,
California. She also held management posi-tions
at Micro Card Technologies and Texas
Instruments.
Ms. De Rosa received a bachelor���s degree in
accounting from the University of Arizona and
a master’s of business administration degree
from the Harvard Business School.
• • •
OCLC Marketing vice president named
Catherine De Rosa
On Sept. 20 ( the same day that Southern Illinois
University entered the 48 millionth bibliographic
record into WorldCat), Norma Forbes ( right) of
the Edmund Cardinal Szoka Library at Sacred
Heart Major Seminary in Detroit, Michigan,
entered the 111 millionth request on the OCLC
Interlibrary Loan service. It was at least the
second time that both millionth marks fell on the
same day. Ms. Forbes is pictured with Jo
Garcia, senior clerk, at the library.
photo provided by Sacred Heart Major Seminary
photo provided by Catherine De Rosa
M E M B E R S H I P N E W S
8 OCLC Newsletter November/ December 2001
Subject to the approval of the bankruptcy court,
OCLC has made an offer to purchase substantially
all the assets of netLibrary and assume certain
netLibrary liabilities. netLibrary is a leading
provider of eBooks, eTextbooks and Internet-based
content/ collection management services.
Concurrently, netLibrary announced that it has
voluntarily filed a petition with the
U. S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Colorado for relief
under Chapter 11 of the U. S.
Bankruptcy Code. The transac-tion
includes a loan from
OCLC, to be repaid upon the
consummation of the asset sale, to
fund netLibrary’s on- going operations through the
transition period. OCLC’s purchase of
netLibrary’s assets and its operating- funds loan to
netLibrary are both subject to approval of the
bankruptcy court.
“ Electronic books and other forms of elec-tronic
content are quickly becoming strategic dri-vers
in the sharing and advancement of
knowledge in the digital age,” said Jay Jordan,
president and CEO, OCLC. “ This potential alliance
with netLibrary would advance our strategic
directive to deliver technologies and services that
support, extend and enhance the OCLC member-ship
cooperative. eBooks complement our grow-ing
e- journal collection and provide exciting new
synergies for our cataloging, resource sharing, ref-erence
and digital preservation services.”
“ Across the OCLC cooperative, there is strong
interest in OCLC’s pursuing an alliance that would
continue to make netLibrary’s eBook collection
available,” said William J. Crowe, chair, OCLC
Board of Trustees. “ Indeed, 14 of OCLC’s 16 U. S.
regional network affiliates have arrangements for
libraries in their regions to purchase netLibrary
resources. The OCLC Board of Trustees has
expressed its strong support for pursuing this
proposed alliance with netLibrary.”
“ OCLC represents an excellent opportunity for
netLibrary patrons, customers and content part-ners
to continue to deliver the benefits of eBooks
and electronic media to an expanding market.
OCLC and netLibrary share a common commit-ment
to grow and strengthen the role of libraries
and educators in the digital age,” said Rob
Kaufman, president and CEO of netLibrary.
“ We are proud of netLibrary’s role in pioneering
the eBook and eTextbook markets. A potential
alliance with OCLC would extend the opportu-nity
to reach more patrons, grow catalog content
and provide new and innovative learning oppor-tunities
in libraries, classrooms, homes and offices
around the globe.”
netLibrary develops and markets eBooks and
MetaText digital textbooks. eBooks are full-text
electronic versions of
published books that library
patrons can search, borrow,
read, and return via the
Internet. With netLibrary
eBooks, users can access library resources any-where,
anytime, and perform full- text searches
across hundreds of books or within a specific
book to speed research and reference projects.
eBooks can be viewed online from any location
using an Internet browser. netLibrary’s catalog
now contains approximately 40,000 titles
covering a wide range of subject areas such
as business, economics, technology, the social
sciences and more.
netLibrary also markets MetaText digital text-books,
interactive, web- based textbooks with
enhanced teaching, collaborating and learning
tools for teachers and students. MetaText works
with the leading textbook publishers to transform
print textbooks into course- centric digital text-book
learning environments. The MetaText cata-log
of digital textbooks, which includes more
than 160 titles, covers topical areas ranging from
Anthropology to Zoology.
netLibrary < http:// www. netLibrary. com/> is
the leading provider of eBooks and Internet- based
content management services for the institutional
library market. netLibrary develops, archives,
hosts, and maintains eBook collections for acade-mic,
corporate, public, and school libraries.
Thousands of libraries throughout the United
States and internationally are currently providing
netLibrary eBooks to their patrons. The MetaText
Division < http:// www. MetaText. com/> of
netLibrary creates, hosts and manages web- based
digital textbooks for leading textbook publishers.
MetaText digital textbooks provide instructors
and students with a full range of interactive teach-ing,
collaborating and learning tools.
• • •
OCLC makes offer to purchase assets of netLibrary
M E M B E R S H I P N E W S
OCLC Newsletter November/ December 2001 9
by Hans- Jörg Lieder
A number of well- known European libraries,
archives, research and documentation centers
have recently combined their resources and
expertise in the Linking and Exploring Authority
Files project ( LEAF). LEAF has set out to find solu-tions
for some of the problems involved in pro-viding
a common service for the discovery,
annotation and exchange of authority records
( persons and corporate bodies) on an interna-tional
level.
The benefits of the use of authority records
have been widely acknowledged. Linked to the
name in a resource record, the authority record
offers a separately maintained definitive and rich
description of the entity represented by the
name. Widespread access to authority records
will reduce the costs of cataloging work in
libraries and archives, as well as the costs for bio-graphical
research undertaken in various scien-tific
projects. The use of authority records also
ensures that the representation of the objects in
question is one of high quality.
In Europe, however, online access to ( national)
data pools of authority records is, by and large,
limited to huge institutions. Smaller libraries and
archives in general are cut off from this service.
Public users— such as scholars searching for man-uscripts—
so far have no access at all to this infor-mation,
even though their search and retrieval
strategies could greatly benefit from it.
LEAF aims at changing this unsatisfactory situa-tion
by developing a model architecture for a dis-tributed
search system that will harvest existing
name authority records in various European coun-tries.
The retrieved information will not only be
presented to the user of the system but also
partly be saved and stored in a pan- European
“ Common Name Authority File.” Here, differing
forms of name authority records relating to the
same individual or corporate body are linked
together enabling more comprehensive and accu-rate
searches by external users and greater oppor-tunities
for further refinement of records by
professional users. Results will include both a
common core of all available authority data plus
the information where this data was harvested.
The ultimate vision is that a user will be able to
ask: What items connected to a specific person
or corporate body exist in European archives,
libraries and museums?
The feasibility of the LEAF model architecture
will be demonstrated by integrating the project
results into the services of the Manuscripts And
Letters Via Integrated Networks in Europe
( MALVINE) network that allows searches for infor-mation
about modern manuscript holdings in a
number of major European organizations
< http:// www. malvine. org/>. Placed in this spe-cific
context, additional benefits of all involved
parties having access to the Common Name
Authority File will become apparent. Small orga-nizations
without electronic data may indicate
that manuscripts relevant to a particular data
In December 2000, a conference was held at the Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin in
Germany to discuss two projects funded by the European Commission.
The projects promote the ability for many European libraries to share their
collections and expertise. Following the conference, OCLC became an observing
partner for the LEAF project.
MALVINE and LEAF projects promote library sharing
in Europe
M E M B E R S H I P N E W S
10 OCLC Newsletter November/ December 2001
record in the Common Name Authority File are to
be found in their holdings. A scholarly user may
add corrections and/ or additions to a particular
record via a web interface and thus improve its
quality and richness. Commercial agents— such
as manuscript dealers— may add customized
offers to specific records.
Universal access of this kind to authority
records will, of course, necessitate a human ele-ment
checking the provided information. Since
only actual user queries will gener-ate
a data record in the Common
Name Authority File, the amount of
incoming information requiring edi-torial
work is expected to be man-ageable.
The LEAF consortium acknowl-edges
that many current projects
work in the area of authority
records and therefore has set up a
network of “ observing partners,”
who, though not formally part of
the project, have access to most
documentation and can voice their
views as appropriate. In the USA,
OCLC, the Library of Congress, the
Research Libraries Group and the
Computer Interchange of Museum
Information consortium act as
observing partners. In Europe num-bers
are larger and include a variety
of organizations that differ in size,
scope and purpose. It is to be hoped that this
network of observing partners will ensure high
standards of quality in LEAF’s work, and that
duplication of effort will be avoided where
possible.
LEAF started in March 2001 and will run
for three years < http:// www. leaf- eu. org/>.
— Hans- Jörg Lieder is project manager of
the MALVINE and LEAF projects.
• • •
The Association of Research Libraries and the
OCLC Institute will sponsor a forum for library
directors Feb. 15– 17, at the Golden Nugget Hotel,
Las Vegas, Nevada.
“ Future Library Architecture: Conception,
Design and Use of Library Space,” this year’s
ARL/ OCLC Strategic Issues Forum, will be an aca-demic
library community discussion of the future
of library space and facilities development.
Digital technologies, economic pressures and user
expectations affect development of new library
space along many dimensions: user space, collec-tion
space, service space, activity space, intellec-tual
space and virtual space.
Topics of the forum include the importance
and role of various “ spaces” in a knowledge soci-ety,
the changing nature of knowledge resources
and its impact on collection management and
storage space, creating physical and virtual spaces
that support changing user demands and behav-iors,
creating or repurposing space when library
services or activities change and redefining the
library’s place as the center of the academy.
The Strategic Issues Forum provides thought-provoking
presentations by colleagues and profes-sional
leaders matched with audience discussion
and debate. Its goals are to engage library leaders
in an exploration of important issues affecting the
future development of library space and to help
prepare library directors to envision and make
the case for innovative library spaces that are
directly responsive to user needs and interests.
• • •
Third ARL/ OCLC Strategic Issues Forum scheduled
for February
M E M B E R S H I P N E W S
OCLC Newsletter November/ December 2001 11
To help libraries better serve their increasingly
diverse user populations, OCLC has expanded its
non- English language collection development
product. OCLC Language Sets now comprise
OCLC AsiaLink Sets, OCLC Russian Sets and the
new OCLC Spanish Sets.
OCLC Language Sets offer selection, acquisi-tion,
cataloging and physical processing of books
and videos in an “ all- in- one” package. Currently,
preselected sets for children and adults are avail-able
in Chinese, Japanese, Korean, Vietnamese,
Russian and Spanish.
Each set is selected by collections and lan-guage
experts at OCLC and consists of a mix of
high- quality fiction and nonfiction materials.
Selectors take great care to compose sets for
adults that appeal to a variety of interests; all titles
are bestsellers or award- winners— making these
collections suitable for public and academic
libraries. The children’s sets include a range of
reading levels from preschool to teen.
Introducing Spanish Sets
Responding to the increasing need for Spanish
language materials, OCLC introduced Spanish Sets
in September. Both books and videos are in Latin
American Spanish. Libraries can be assured that
no titles will overlap with their current holdings
because OCLC selectors work from advance
notices of prepublication information. At pre-sent,
four sets are available:
• Books for Adults ( 20 titles per set)
• Books for Children ( 10 titles per set)
• Videos for Teens/ Adults ( 5 titles per set)
• Videos for Children ( 3 titles per set)
A new Spanish set in each category will be
available every other month. Sets will not dupli-cate
titles and each set will “ retire” upon ship-ment.
To offer greater flexibility, libraries may
order a small number of sets or create a standing
order. Sets will be shipped in November, January,
March, May, July and September.
The cost of the set includes: selection, acquisi-tion,
full MARC cataloging and Spanish ( Bilindex)
subject headings. Shipping is free. Physical pro-cessing
is available for an additional charge.
AsiaLink and Russian Sets
AsiaLink continues to offer annual sets of 25, 50
or 100 preselected titles in Chinese, Korean and
Vietnamese; Japanese sets contain 20, 40 or 80
titles. Title lists are updated annually. AsiaLink
Update Sets let libraries add an additional 25 or
50 titles on a quarterly or semi- annual basis.
Japanese update sets contain 20 or 40 titles. Titles
in the update sets do not overlap with the annual
sets, giving libraries a means to speed up their
collection building.
The Russian Sets will follow the AsiaLink pat-tern:
annual sets of 25, 50 or 100 preselected
titles for adult and juvenile readers. Update Sets
are also available.
More information about the OCLC Language
Sets is available on the web < http:// www. oclc. org/
languagesets/ index. shtm>.
• • •
OCLC Language Sets expanded
M E M B E R S H I P N E W S
12 OCLC Newsletter November/ December 2001
OCLC is hosting a number of meetings at the
American Library Association Conference in New
Orleans, Louisiana.
A preconference work-shop,
sponsored by OCLC
Digital & Preservation Services,
titled “ All the News That’s Fit to
Scan: Increasing Access to
Historic Newspapers,” will be
held 8 a. m.– 12: 30 p. m. Friday,
Jan. 18.
The OCLC Symposium,“ Re-conceptualizing
Cataloging,” is
scheduled for Friday from
1: 30– 4: 30 p. m. Four guest
speakers will discuss the
expanding roles of and
demands on information man-agement
communities.
The traditional OCLC Update Breakfast is
scheduled from 7– 9 a. m. Sunday, Jan. 20. A new
tote bag will be presented to attendees.
On Saturday, Jan. 19, OCLC will host these
sessions:
• 7 a. m.— Dewey Update Breakfast
• 9 a. m.— Planning for Life without Passport: An
Overview of the New OCLC Cataloging Service
and Metadata Interface
• 10 a. m.— OCLC Digital and Preservation
Resources Services: An Overview
• 10 a. m.— Cooperative Reference: How It Can
Work for You!
• 1 p. m.— Distance Learning Up Close:
Considerations for Decision Makers
• 1: 30 p. m.— OCLC SiteSearch Suite Open Forum
• 4: 30 p. m.— OCLC Enhance Sharing Session
On Sunday, Jan. 20, OCLC will
host the following sessions:
• 7 a. m.— Update Breakfast
• 10 a. m.— OCLC Digital and
Preservation Resources
Services: An Overview
( a repeat of the Saturday
session)
• 10 a. m.— The Cataloger, the
Public Services Librarian and
Metadata: Can this marriage
be saved?
• 1 p. m.— OCLC FirstSearch and
WorldCat: Making It Better!
The following OCLC User Group sessions will
also be held:
• 4: 30 p. m. Saturday, Jan. 19— OCLC ILL
• 4: 30 p. m. Sunday, Jan. 20— OCLC ILLiad
• 9: 30 a. m. Monday, Jan. 21— OCLC CORC
• 10 a. m. Monday, Jan. 21— OCLC Union List
service
Before the conference, please visit < http://
www. oclc. org/ events/ ala> to register and find
specific meeting sites and presentation speakers.
• • •
OCLC meetings at ALA Midwinter 2002
Page 5 of the September/ October OCLC
Newsletter contained an error. According to
Mary Jackson, senior program officer for
Access Services, Association of Research
Libraries, the last paragraph should have
stated:
Waseda University participates in the
AAU/ ARL/ NCC Japan Journal Access Project
through WorldCat using the OCLC Interlibrary
Loan service. Waseda University functions as a
resource sharing service center in Japan,
making its scholarly Japanese collection avail-able
worldwide in support of Japanese studies.
The American Association of Universities ( AAU),
the Association of Research Libraries ( ARL)
and the North American Coordinating Council
on Japanese Library Resources ( NCC) sponsor
the AAU/ ARL/ NCC Japan Journal Access Project.
Waseda University has cataloged new library
acquisitions on WorldCat since 1985.
We regret the error.
• • •
Correction
M E M B E R S H I P N E W S
OCLC Newsletter November/ December 2001 13
The OCLC Institute will host two seminars
at the ALA Midwinter Meeting in New
Orleans.
On Thursday, Jan. 17, the OCLC
Institute will present “ Knowledge Access
Management: Tools and Concepts for
Next- Generation Catalogers,” a one- day
preconference seminar hosted by Loyola
University. This shortened version
( 9 a. m.– 4 p. m.) of the OCLC Institute’s
popular 2– 1/ 2 day seminar discusses
trends, standards and practices that are
defining knowledge access management
in modern librarianship. The course is
designed not to teach cataloging but to
encourage participants to think about cat-aloging
in new ways. Using MARC/ AACR2
cataloging as a departure point, the course
explores alternative methods such as metadata
and the Resource Description Framework. It is
intended for catalogers and resource managers of
all types who want a focused update on this
rapidly changing dimension of the profession.
On Saturday, Jan. 19, from 1– 3 p. m., the OCLC
Institute will host “ Distance Learning Up Close:
Considerations for Decision Makers.”
This no- cost, two- hour session is
designed for both consumers and pro-ducers
of distance learning. The course
will review current delivery media and
associated costs, discuss the questions
decision- makers need to ask, and look at
resources for further investigation of dis-tance
learning delivery modalities.
Registration details for both sessions,
including costs for the pre- conference
seminar, are available from the OCLC
Institute web site < http:// www. oclc. org/
institute/>.
Visitors to the OCLC booth during
exhibition hours— Saturday through
Monday, Jan. 19– 21— can discuss personal or
organizational development goals with OCLC
Institute staff, including Erik Jul, executive direc-tor,
and Linda Evers, associate director. Guests
will receive a complementary Professional
Development Plan template and learn how the
OCLC Institute can help.
• • •
OCLC Institute to host seminars at ALA Midwinter
The OCLC Institute is presenting a series of three
satellite videoconferences to help librarians incor-porate
emerging knowledge- sharing standards.
Each of the videoconferences will bring
together an industry- recognized standards expert
and two practitioners with real- world issues. The
audience will have the opportunity to interact
with the experts, and the host will facilitate dis-cussion
and debate among participants.
Called “ Steering by Standards,” the videoconfer-ence
series will include:
• “ Sharing Metadata”— March 26; with host
Lorcan Dempsey, vice president, OCLC Office
of Research, and featuring Herbert Van de
Sompel, formerly e- director, British Library
• “ The Open Archives Information System”
— April 19; with host Meg Bellinger, vice presi-dent,
OCLC Digital & Preservation Resources,
and featuring Donald Sawyer, lead, NASA/ Science
Office of Standards and Technology
• “ Metadata Standards: MARC
vs. Dublin Core vs. ONIX”
— May 29; with host Gary Houk,
vice president, OCLC Services, and
featuring Barbara Tillett, director,
Integrated Library System Program
Office, Library of Congress
“ These complex new standards will
significantly impact librarians and other
information professionals, their institutions,
budgets, staffs, systems and workflows,” said Erik
Jul, executive director, OCLC Institute. “ Gaining
practical insights into these global initiatives will
help library leaders decide more quickly and
effectively how to respond locally.”
More details on speakers, dates and times, pric-ing
options, and a downlink license request form
are available on the OCLC Institute web site
< http:// www. oclc. org/ institute/>.
• • •
OCLC Institute to present “ Steering
by Standards” videoconference series
M E M B E R S H I P N E W S
14 OCLC Newsletter November/ December 2001
In May, OCLC Canada moved to new office
space in Chambly, Québec. In addition to
offices for staff, the facility provides a small
conference room for meetings.
“ It is great to now have the sales and ser-vice
staff located in the same office,” said
Daniel Boivin, director, OCLC Canada. “ The
relocation of the staff in one area allows us
to communicate, interact and share more
efficiently various types of information.
In this new space, we are able to offer
improved services to all our users, and we
invite them to come and visit us.”
The number of Canadian libraries using
OCLC services has grown from 50 to 560
since the division’s inception in 1997.
The new office is at 701 Salaberry
Street, Suite 200, Chambly, Québec
J3L 2R1.
• • •
OCLC Canada staff settled in new office
OCLC Canada and the Canadian Library
Association have announced a new award to assist
professional librarians in the 21st century.
The OCLC/ CLA Northern Exposure to
Leadership Institute Award recipient in 2001 is
Tracey Palmer of Kesnick, Ontario. The $ 1,000
award assists librarians in attending the Northern
Exposure to Leadership Institute.
The Northern Exposure to Leadership
Institute’s mission is to “ assist professional
librarians to develop, strengthen and exercise
their leadership skills so that they may be better
equipped to formulate, articulate and achieve
the future changes required by librarians into the
21st century.”
The sixth Northern Exposure to Leadership
Institute will be held in Emerald Lake, British
Columbia, Feb. 7– 12, 2002.
• • •
OCLC Canada and the CLA announce Northern Exposure
to Leadership Institute Award winner
OCLC Statistics
( as of Nov. 1, 2001)
Current statistics are at
< http:// www. oclc. org/ news/
product/ statistics. shtm>.
Participating
libraries
40,830
New member libraries
( Sept. 1– Oct. 31, 2001)
129
Total OCLC Interlibrary Loan
( ILL) service requests
112,209,328
Tracey Palmer
photo provided by OCLC Canada
The OCLC Canada
staff includes
( left to right)
Manon Barbeau,
training and
implementation
specialist; Sylvain
Robichaud, library
services
specialist; and
Daniel Boivin,
director.
photo provided by CLA
M E M B E R S H I P N E W S
OCLC Newsletter November/ December 2001 15
Ingram Library Services and OCLC announced a
new alliance to provide libraries with improved
services via the exchange of bibliographic infor-mation
and metadata for videos several weeks
before their release date.
Under terms of the agreement, professional
catalogers at OCLC will provide full cataloging
records of new release videos supplied by
Ingram. These records will be added to both
WorldCat and Ingram’s cataloging database,
BookMARC.
“ For the past several years, public libraries
have been asking OCLC to increase its video cata-loging
coverage,” said Maureen Finn, executive
director, OCLC Library Resources. “ Librarians can
now order popular videos in either VHS or DVD
format, log onto WorldCat and get the full biblio-graphic
record— even before receipt of the
videos.”
Greg McKinney, director, OCLC Metadata
Contract Services, said that because of the new
agreement with Ingram Library Services, OCLC is
now able to receive new video titles up to 12
weeks ahead of their general release dates. “ This
is a boon for acquisition librarians who request
full bibliographic records for videos,” he said.
�� With Ingram’s help, records for about 90 percent
of popular video titles will be available before
release.”
Ingram sends a screening copy of a video to
OCLC, where it is cataloged in DVD, VHS and, if
applicable, Spanish version formats.
“ This new partnership enables us to quickly
deliver crucial information to our customers,” said
Jim Kelly, president of Ingram Library Services.
“ We also will ensure that the top requested titles
are prioritized by both release date and market
demand so that our customers have the records
they most need at the earliest possible moment.”
“ All libraries with video collections will benefit
from the earlier availability of quality cataloging
data,” said Gary Houk, vice president, OCLC
Metadata Services. “ WorldCat currently contains
over 1 million records for videos. Through this
collaboration with Ingram, we will improve a
library’s video hit rate for current materials, sav-ing
our member libraries both time and money.”
Mr. Kelly agreed: “ Whether libraries take advan-tage
of Ingram processing or rely on their own
technical services staff, the end result is the
same— videos available sooner than ever to meet
user demand. Our goal is to deliver a quicker
turn for shelf- ready video product.”
Headquartered in La Vergne, Tennessee, Ingram
Library Services is a major distributor of books,
music and videos to library markets. Ingram oper-ates
a technical services department that provides
cataloging and physical processing services along
with the materials they sell to library customers.
Ingram Book Group is a leading wholesaler of
trade books, spoken audio and magazines. In addi-tion
to Ingram Library Services, its operating units
include Ingram Book Company, Ingram Periodicals,
Ingram International, Spring Arbor Distributors,
Tennessee Book Company, Ingram Fulfillment
Services and Ingram Customer Systems.
OCLC Metadata Contract Services offers cus-tomized
contract cataloging and physical process-ing
for libraries of all types and sizes, in all
formats and in a wide variety of languages
< http:// www. oclc. org/ oclc/ menu/ techpro. htm>.
• • •
Ingram Library Services and OCLC to provide prerelease
video cataloging information
Highest OCLC
record number
48,265,070
Location listings
( holdings)
822,678,223
FirstSearch libraries
19,246
Jim Kelly
photo provided by Ingram Library Services
The National Library of Australia
( NLA) and OCLC will provide small
libraries in Australia with access to
WorldCat on a trial basis. Australian spe-cial,
school, public and other small
libraries will access WorldCat
through the NLA’s Kinetica
service in 2002.
“ We are delighted to offer access
to OCLC WorldCat through the
Kinetica service,” said Jan
Fullerton, director- general,
National Library of
Australia. “ This will enable
many smaller Australian libraries to have access to
the rich resources of WorldCat for the first time.”
“ We welcome these libraries to the OCLC com-munity,”
said Jay Jordan, OCLC president and chief
executive officer. “ OCLC is pleased to enhance
the local cooperative initiatives of the National
Library of Australia.”
The National Library of Australia operates
Kinetica, Australia’s library network serving over
1,000 Australian libraries of all types. NLA’s
Kinetica provides access to over 33 million items
held in Australian libraries.
• • •
OCLC to collaborate with National Library of Australia
to provide gateway to WorldCat to small libraries
M E M B E R S H I P N E W S
16 OCLC Newsletter November/ December 2001
Catalogers and other library professionals have
entered over 500,000 records describing elec-tronic
resources into WorldCat. On Aug. 29, Linda
Swope, OCLC Metadata Contract Services
Division, entered the 500,000th record on behalf
of OhioLink— a consortium of libraries from 78
Ohio colleges and universities and the State
Library of Ohio. The record describes an elec-tronic
copy of Optical Networks Magazine.
“ WorldCat contains records describing physical
and digital resources,” said Marty Withrow, direc-tor,
OCLC Metadata Services. “ From records for
digital art and historical collections, to oral inter-views
and scientific documents, this valuable
resource is constantly increasing in value for
library staff and library users.”
Library staff and users access records in
WorldCat for reference, interlibrary loan and cata-loging
needs. Libraries may catalog records for dig-ital
resources— items accessed via a URL— using
either the OCLC Cooperative Online Resource
Catalog ( CORC) service or the OCLC Cataloging
service. The records describing these resources
may be viewed using the OCLC FirstSearch service
or any OCLC cataloging interface.
CORC is a web- based, metadata- creation sys-tem
optimized for the creation of bibliographic
records and pathfinders ( subject bibliographies)
for electronic resources— both those held in the
library and those available on the web. OCLC
continues to enhance and develop CORC, with
the goal of introducing a new, browser- based cata-loging
toolset by mid- 2002.
“ OCLC is moving full speed ahead with its ser-vices
in order to meet the challenges of 21st cen-tury
scholarly research activities,” said Jackie Shieh,
president of the CORC Users Group and team
leader, Special Projects & Collections Team, Harlan
Hatcher Graduate Library, University of Michigan.
“ CORC, which began as a research project in 1999,
provides the foundation for the soon- to- be cata-loging
and metadata interface, a leading- edge tool
that will benefit users worldwide.”
CORC is built on the same model as WorldCat.
By helping libraries work together and eliminate
duplicate effort, OCLC helps lower cataloging
costs for all libraries. Now in its 30th year,
WorldCat contains more than 48 million unique
records for books and other resources held by
libraries around the world.
The OCLC Metadata Contract Services offer
customized contract cataloging and physical pro-cessing
for libraries of all types and sizes, in all
formats, and in a wide variety of languages
< http:// www. oclc. org/ oclc/ menu/ techpro. htm>.
The OCLC Cooperative Online Resource
Catalog service offers a toolkit, based on technol-ogy
developed at OCLC, that supports automated
record creation, authority control, URL mainte-nance
and pathfinder creation
< http:// www. oclc. org/ corc/>.
• • •
WorldCat now contains more than 500,000 records
for digital resources
M E M B E R S H I P N E W S
OCLC Newsletter November/ December 2001 17
by George Needham
On Oct. 17, nearly 100 librarians, trustees, ven-dors,
OCLC staff and others gathered in OCLC’s
Kilgour Atrium for “ Ohio Dinners for Spectrum.”
The event raised $ 5,800 for the American Library
Association’s Spectrum Scholarship Initiative.
The Spectrum Initiative’s major drive is to
recruit applicants and award scholarships to
African American, Latino/ Hispanic, Asian/ Pacific
Islander, and Native American/ Alaskan Native stu-dents
for graduate programs in library and infor-mation
studies. The American Library Association
has committed resources for 50 annual scholar-ships
of $ 5,000 a year for the initiative’s first four
years.
The evening featured several highlights. Jay
Jordan welcomed the group and discussed
OCLC’s Inclusion Initiative. Robin Jones of the
Network to Build Better Jobs ( NBBJ) presented
Melvin Kendall, manager, OCLC Corporate
Inclusion, with a plaque for his work in making
computers available to NBBJ’s graduates. Keynote
speaker Khafre K. Abif, the director of the
Langston Hughes Library of the Children’s
Defense Fund, spoke on the role of professional
organizations like OCLC and ALA in making the
profession more inclusive. Mr. Abif had served on
the committee that created the Spectrum
Initiative in 1997.
The dinner was underwritten by OCLC as part
of its Inclusion program, which seeks to increase
diversity within the organization. With OCLC’s
support, all ticket proceeds went directly to the
scholarship program. Co- sponsors for the dinner
were the Academic Library Association of Ohio,
INFOhio, Kent State University School of Library
and Information Science, Ohio Educational
Library Media Association, the Library and
Information Services Program, at Ohio
Dominican College, Ohio Library Council,
OhioLINK, OHIONET, OPLIN and the State
Library of Ohio.— George Needham is vice
president, OCLC Member services.
• • •
“ Ohio Dinners for Spectrum” raises funds,
consciousness for diversity issues
Jay Jordan ( right) greets keynote speaker Khafre Abif at the Ohio
Dinners for Spectrum program.
R E S E A R C H
18 OCLC Newsletter November/ December 2001
In its annual survey of the World Wide Web, the
OCLC Office of Research has determined that the
number of public web sites continues to expand
but at a slower rate, that the distribution of public
web sites over countries and languages has been
stable over the last several years, and that informa-tion
and professional consulting industries oper-ate
the largest proportion of web sites.
“ We may be witnessing the cresting of the first
wave of new web site providers,” said Ed O’Neill,
OCLC consulting research scientist and manager
of the OCLC Web Characterization Project. “ The
recent string of dot- com failures may also be a fac-tor
in the slowdown, as well as the increased use
of virtual hosting technologies, which permit the
clustering of multiple ‘ virtual sites’ at a single
Internet location.”
The Web Characterization Project
< http:// wcp. oclc. org/>, conducted by the OCLC
Office of Research, has collected a random
sample of web sites annually since 1997. A
distinguishing feature of the Web Characterization
Project is that the study is based on a random
sample. Although this methodology is more diffi-cult
to employ than more commonly used
approaches, it allows researchers to make more
unbiased estimates of the size and characteristics
of the web. The OCLC Office of Research is one
of the world’s leading centers devoted exclusively
to the challenges facing libraries in a rapidly
changing information technology environment.
According to statistics compiled for the year
ending June 30, the public web includes more
than 3.1 million sites, a 6 percent increase over
the previous year’s total. A public web site is
defined as a distinct location on the Internet offer-ing
unrestricted public access to content via web
protocols. The rate of growth of the public web
has been slowing over the last few years, a trend
which was especially pronounced over the last 12
months. From 1997 to 2000, the public web
increased by about 700,000 sites each year, but
increased by only 200,000 sites between 2000
and 2001.
Public web sites constitute 36 percent of the
web as a whole; the remainder includes sites that
are duplicates of other public sites, sites that offer
content intended for a restricted audience ( e. g.,
those sites which require prior authorization for
access, or are a web interface to hardware such as
routers or printers), and sites that are “ under con-struction.”
Over the past year, the web as a whole
grew by 18 percent, reaching an estimated total
of nearly 9 million sites. Although more than 1.3
million new sites were added to the web during
this period, growth over the past year is substan-tially
slower than that observed between 1998
and 1999 ( 71 percent) or 1999 and 2000 ( 52 per-cent).
Overall, however, the number of web sites
has increased almost six- fold since OCLC’s first
survey in 1997.
Analysis of public web sites suggests that the
international character of the web— as measured
by the country of origin and languages of public
web site content— has changed little in the last
several years. About half of the sampled public
web sites in 2001 were provided by organizations
or individuals located in the United States, 5 per-cent
by German organizations, and 4 percent
each by Canadian and Japanese organizations.
These results are similar to statistics compiled in
1999. The distribution of languages across web
content has changed very little since 1999: about
75 percent of all public sites in 2001 contained
some content in English; 7 percent in German;
and 5 percent in Japanese.
Analysis of the organizations providing content
on public web sites indicated that the largest pro-portion—
about 16 percent— is associated with
information industries, including Internet service
providers, commercial publishers, software
companies and online information services.
Professional and technical consultants— ranging
from web site and software designers to lawyers
and accountants— comprised the second largest
proportion at 14 percent. Retailers were also
widely represented in the sample at 12 percent.
“ Characterizing the economic activities of web
site providers is a new addition to our survey,” Dr.
O’Neill said.“ This analysis gives a fresh perspec-tive
on the question of ‘ what’s on the web?’”
Adult sites— those containing sexually explicit
material— constitute approximately 2 percent of
the public web, or about 74,000 sites. The pro-portion
of the public web occupied by adult sites
has remained steady since 1998.
• • •
OCLC researchers find slowdown in web growth
Ed O’Neill
R E S E A R C H
OCLC Newsletter November/ December 2001 19
by Robert C. Bolander
The American National
Standards Institute ( ANSI)
has approved the Dublin
Core Metadata Element Set
Z39.85- 2001 ( or “ Dublin
Core”) as a metadata stan-dard
for resource discovery
in a multidisciplinary infor-mation
environment.
This decision adds to the momentum of the
Dublin Core, which is gaining broader support
among governments and business organizations.
“ The approval of Z39.85 formalizes a long
period of consensus- building representing the
efforts of hundreds of people, and all participants
can take pride in what this community has built,”
said Stuart Weibel, executive director, Dublin Core
Metadata Initiative ( DCMI), and consulting
research scientist, OCLC Office of Research.
The Dublin Core proposal was shepherded
through the ANSI standardization process by a
committee of the National Information Standards
Organization ( NISO). John Kunze, University of
California/ National Library of Medicine, chaired
the committee, which included Rebecca
Guenther, Library of Congress; Marjorie Hlava,
Access Innovations; Clifford Morgan , John Wiley
& Sons; and John Perkins , CIMI Consortium.
“ ANSI/ NISO approval is an important step in
progressing Dublin Core toward a formal interna-tional
standard within ISO,” said Mr. Kunze.
Currently six countries ( Australia, Denmark,
Finland, the United Kingdom, Canada and New
Zealand) have adopted Dublin Core for use in
managing discovery of, and access to, their infor-mation
resources. Furthermore, the DCMI
Government Working Group, in collaboration
with the Interchange of Data between
Administrations Programme ( IDA) of the
European Commission, is exploring the possibility
of standardizing the use of metadata across
European governments and parliaments, and
identifying the resources, both technical and non-technical,
that would be required to support this
activity.
In the commercial sector, Adobe Systems has
developed a metadata framework ( XMP) < http://
www. adobe. com/ products/ xmp/ main. html>
that is based on the Dublin Core and other meta-data
schemas. The Adobe approach uses the
Resource Description Framework ( RDF)
< http:// www. w3. org/ rdf/> of the World Wide
Web Consortium ( W3C) to support an extensible
metadata framework that includes the cross- disci-plinary
benefits of Dublin Core with extensions
to support a particular domain or discipline.
This metadata support currently is available in
three Adobe products, including Adobe Acrobat
5.0, the leading page- description language in use
on the web. As XMP is introduced to other prod-ucts
in the Adobe line, it will become practical to
create and manage interoperable metadata from a
variety of media types common to the web.
Metadata
Metadata is structured information that describes,
explains, locates or otherwise makes it easier to
retrieve, use or manage an information resource.
The Dublin Core originally was developed to be
simple and concise, and to describe web- based
documents. The current standard defines 15
metadata elements for resource description in a
cross- disciplinary information environment.
These elements are: title, subject, description,
source, language, relation, coverage, creator, pub-lisher,
contributor, rights, date, type, format and
identifier.
Providing machine- understandable data on the
web has become a priority not just for publishers
and scientific communities, but for a wide range
of commercial ventures and services. Resource
discovery across a diversity of services on the
emerging Semantic web < http:// www. w3. org/
2001/ sw/> is facilitated by the use of shared
metadata vocabularies such as the Dublin Core
Metadata Element Set.
History of Dublin Core
Dublin Core and DCMI, the organization that
coordinates its development, began in 1995 with
an invitational workshop in Dublin, Ohio, that
brought together librarians, digital library
researchers, content providers and text- markup
experts to improve discovery standards for infor-mation
resources. The original Dublin Core
emerged as a small set of descriptors that quickly
drew global interest from a wide variety of infor-mation
providers in the arts, sciences, education,
business and government sectors.
Dublin Core Metadata Element Set approved
as ANSI Standard Z39.85- 2001
R E S E A R C H
20 OCLC Newsletter November/ December 2001
The initial workshop spawned a series of meet-ings
that has supported international, cross-disciplinary
metadata development. DC- 2001, the
ninth meeting in this series, was held Oct. 22– 26,
in Tokyo, Japan. Cosponsored by the National
Institute for Informatics < http:// www. nii. ac. jp/>
( Japan), the DCMI, and Japan Science and
Technology Corporation < http:// www. jst. go. jp/
EN/>, this meeting was the first event in the DC
Workshop series to be hosted in Asia, and also
was the first event to include conference and
tutorial tracks in addition to the workshop.
The Dublin Core Metadata Initiative
DCMI < http:// www. dublincore. org/> is an orga-nization
dedicated to promoting the widespread
adoption of interoperable metadata standards and
developing specialized metadata vocabularies for
describing resources that enable more intelligent
information- discovery systems. It provides an
open forum for the development of standards and
vocabularies across a broad range of purposes
and business models. Its activities include con-sensus-
driven working groups, global workshops,
conferences, standards liaison and educational
efforts to promote widespread acceptance of
metadata standards and practices. DCMI will act
as the maintenance agency for the Dublin Core
Metadata Element Set standard.
The American National Standards Institute
ANSI < http:// www. ansi. org/> is a private, non-profit
organization that administers and coordi-nates
the U. S. voluntary standardization and
conformity assessment system. Founded in 1918,
the institute’s mission is to enhance both the
global competitiveness of U. S. business and the
U. S. quality of life by promoting and facilitating
voluntary consensus standards and conformity
assessment systems, and safeguarding their
integrity.
National Information Standards Organization
NISO < http:// www. niso. org/>, a nonprofit associ-ation,
is the only U. S. group accredited by ANSI to
develop and promote technical standards used in
a wide variety of information services. NISO’s
voting members and other supporters include a
broad base of information producers and users
including libraries, publishers, government agen-cies
and information- based businesses. All NISO
standards are developed by consensus under the
guidance of experts and practitioners in the field
to meet the needs of both the information user
and the producer.— Robert C. Bolander is man-ager,
Communications and Programs, OCLC Office
of Research.
• • •
R E S E A R C H
OCLC Newsletter November/ December 2001 21
by Shirley Hyatt
Kathleen Braverman spoke
at OCLC on Aug. 28, as part
of the Office of Research-sponsored
Distinguished
Seminar Series. Dr.
Braverman is a consultant
for Global Lead Manage-ment
Corporation, a con-sulting
firm specializing in
diversity and inclusion
issues in the workplace. Her presentation, titled
“ Social Dialects in America’s Workplace,” exam-ined
the array of communication challenges pre-sented
by differences in speech styles and
linguistic behaviors. Her goal was to improve the
chances for successful communication by increas-ing
the audience members’ awareness of their
reactions to people who sound different from
them and whose culturally based communications
behaviors they are likely to misinterpret.
Dr. Braverman began her lecture by presenting
some fundamentals of social linguistics. A social
dialect is a variety of a language, developed
though a complex interplay of historical, social,
political, educational, economic and linguistic fac-tors.
A standard dialect is one spoken by politi-cally,
socially, economically and educationally
powerful and prestigious people. In the United
States, this is typically the “ General American
Dialect” or “ Educated Eastern Dialect”; both
dialects are commonly spoken by television
broadcasters or on PBS radio. Race, ethnicity,
social class, education, occupation, region, gen-der,
context, peer group identification and first
language community all impact the type of lan-guage
and communicative behavior acquired by
an individual. Most of us perceive our own lin-guistic
habits as “ right” and speech patterns that
differ from ours as “ wrong” because they are non-standard
relative to our own accustomed speech
environment, but it is important to understand
that there is no “ correct” dialect.
As Dr. Braverman pointed out through numer-ous
examples, culture influences members’ rules
of contact and thus has a major impact on com-munication—
both what is communicated and
how it is communicated. The “ how” of language
— voice quality, pitch, loudness, articulation, flu-ency,
speech rate, pronunciation, rhythm and
also body movement and use of space— is more
important than the “ what” of communications,
and varies widely by nationality, ethnic back-ground
and gender. Though acceptable within
their native culture, such differences may be jar-ring
to an unacquainted ear. Dr. Braverman asked
the audience to consider their personal reactions
to her examples:
• Semantics: “ For the past six months at work, I
have reported to a ___________” ( woman, gal,
girl, female, ... ) The word choice here reveals
much about the speaker’s attitude or state of
mind, and that choice may well determine the
listener’s reaction to it.
• Phonology: The vowel sounds in “ out,”
“ tough,” and “ although” are quite subtle
differences for nonnative English speakers to
discern. When non- native speakers make
phonological errors, native speakers frequently
judge their competency and even intelligence
to be inferior. Dr. Braverman noted that her
clients have told her that people in the
Midwest generally are less tolerant of other
dialects than are people on either coast.
• Syntax: �� Don’t nobody want none.” Though
non- standard, this sentence is acceptable
within many speech communities.
• Pragmatics: Who can say what to whom and
under what circumstances varies widely. In
some cultures, it is acceptable to show
emotion because it is honest and reflects a
willingness to work out differences; in others,
it is not. Cultures may also have implicit
hierarchy rules governing what subordinates
may say to their superiors. In exchanges
involving both styles, the worker who speaks
up to defend herself may be labeled as overly
aggressive.
• Speech rate and fluency: The numbers of
words per minute varies among social dialects.
Speakers from the Eastern United States tend
to use a faster rate of speaking than do
Midwesterners and Southerners, whose rate of
speech is slower yet than Midwesterners.
People who speak rapidly may judge people
who speak more slowly as less intelligent;
conversely, speakers of more laid- back social
Kathleen Braverman discusses the impact
of linguistic dialects on the workplace
Shirley Hyatt
R E S E A R C H
22 OCLC Newsletter November/ December 2001
dialects tend to judge some speakers of
Eastern social dialects as aggressive or
obnoxious.
For each aspect of language difference, and for
every example, we can probably summon per-sonal
examples and occasions when we may have
fallen short of communicative “ egalitarianism.”
Many individuals have developed “ communica-tive
competence” in several different social
dialects and are able to “ code switch” into the sit-uationally
appropriate dialect more or less auto-matically.
They are able to modify their own
speech patterns adeptly according to the context
in which they are communicating. Though Dr.
Braverman emphasized that there is no “ right”
style of communication, having a larger repertoire
of communication competencies increases one’s
flexibility and probability of success.
Doesn’t it seem truly amazing that any of us
ever succeed in communicating precisely our
intended message to a listener in any situation? It
is particularly surprising in work situations where
people from diverse backgrounds increasingly
may be found working side by side, or in virtual
space. Standard English Dialect is the social
dialect most acceptable in the majority of the
regions of the United States. Most speakers of
other dialects understand easily Standard English,
even if they don’t speak it, because they are used
to listening to newscasters and others in the
media. However, in regions of the country where
other dialects are dominant, the use of the local
dialects is preferred by the native speakers. In
regions of the country where Standard English is
the dominant dialect, acceptance of a speaker of
a different dialect is less certain.
Dr. Braverman discussed gender differences in
communications styles and their impact on com-municative
success. One’s access to power may be
heavily dependent upon one’s ability to consis-tently
make a favorable impression when speaking.
Social linguist Deborah Tannen describes it this
way,“ But what is power? The ability to influence
others, to be listened to, to get your way rather
than having to do what others want. How you
talk creates power, both by gaining influence
within the role you have, ensuring that you are
given the responsibility to make decisions, and
earning promotions to higher levels of institu-tional
power.”
Does this mean that women should simply imi-tate
the communication behavior of men in the
workplace? In general, the answer would be “ No,
it is not that simple.” Does this mean that there
may be times when it is to a woman’s advantage
to adapt her style to be more effective? Yes, it
does. Does this same advice— that they may want
to adapt their natural style, especially when work-ing
with women— apply to men? Yes, it does.
Here are some of the ways in which males and
females often differ in terms of their communica-tions
styles.
• Rapport versus report talk— Women in
business often share personal stories with
other women and expect other women to
respond in kind, to build rapport. Also,
women tend to expect their manager,
especially a female manager, to show an
interest in their personal lives. Men also talk to
build connections. However, the content is
different, as men tend to talk about sports,
politics or details about how a project or
hobby was accomplished.
• Network versus hierarchy— Status and
connection are not mutually interconnected; in
fact, they are intertwined. However, men tend
to focus more on establishing status— Who’s
one up? Who’s one down? Men may be said to
use a sports or military model when working
on a team ( see illustration). Women, however,
tend to talk about building relationships to get
things done, de- emphasizing hierarchical
status. Women tend to get things done by
building networks.
• Approach to problems— When women
share problems, they often are looking for
empathy or to talk through the elements of a
situation to help clarify their thinking as they
process the situation and decide how to deal
with it. Men often interpret this behavior as a
request for help, and they, in attempting to be
helpful, offer solutions to help “ fix” the
problem or advice about how best to address
the situation. Men tend to keep their problems
to themselves as they process what to do,
unless they want another’s advice.
• Approach to conflict— More often than
women, men tend to view conflict as a means
to connect or to bond. Sometimes, they will
play the role of devil’s advocate to enjoy the
challenge of bantering. In contrast, to the
extent that a woman views conflict as a threat
to her connection or relationship with another,
she may avoid addressing the conflict directly.
She may talk about the conflict with a third
party, give in, or simply avoid it and hope that
it goes away on its own.
R E S E A R C H
OCLC Newsletter November/ December 2001 23
• Explicit versus implicit— More women than
men are raised in environments where they are
expected to pay attention to contextual cues to
determine appropriate behavior, and to
respond to the situational need. Since
everyone is privy to the same, shared
information, there is no need for direct
information. Other men and women are used
to environments where there is explicit, direct
communication when there is need for action.
Emphasis is on the content of the verbal
communication rather than the situational
contexts. There is great potential for frus-tration
and miscommunication when there is a
“ miss” in this cultural expectation between a
manager and his/ her direct reports or
co- workers. Dr. Braverman recommended that,
when in doubt, direct communication in the
workplace is usually a more successful strategy
to avoid confusion and disappointment.
• Nonverbal communication— There are
documented differences in the nonverbal
communications of men and women. Women,
for example, smile more than men. What does
it mean when a woman smiles and nods her
heard while someone is talking. Does it mean
agreement? Not necessarily. It simply means
she is listening. Women also have more eye
contact, and they take up less space in
proportion to their body size than men. Men,
on the other hand, initiate touch and interrupt
more often than women.
• Verbal communication— Women are more
likely to begin sentences with qualifiers such
as,“ If you think this might be relevant” or
“ Maybe” or “ I don’t know if this will work,
but ...” Women also finish declarative
sentences with upward vocal inflection more
often than do men. Both of these behaviors
give listeners the impression that the speaker
lacks confidence in what she is saying. On the
other hand, females who exhibit opposite- sex
non- verbal and verbal behaviors are judged
more harshly than females who exhibit gender-appropriate
behaviors. It appears that working
women are in a double bind: they’re judged
negatively if they conform to gender-appropriate
standards of behavior, and they are
judged negatively if they exhibit behavior
more typical of males. ( Both men and women
tend to give these negative judgments.)
Dr. Braverman cautioned the audience that
these statements are only true generally. Many
individuals don’t conform to these generalities;
studies show, for example, that only 75 percent of
women may conform to them.
In closing, Dr. Braverman reiterated her goal to
provide information to help listeners improve
their conscious awareness of their reactions to
people who sound and behave differently, so that
they can begin to develop tools and skills to
bridge gaps in communication effectiveness.
— Shirley Hyatt is marketing and transition man-ager,
OCLC Office of Research.
• • •
Do what the leader says.
Get the job done.
Make personal sacrifices, if necessary.
Give/ get critical feedback to improve
performance.
Limit unnecessary talk.
PYRAMID
MODEL
RULES FOR
TEAM PLAYERS
NETWORK
MODEL
The goal is to put forth your
personal best effort.
RULES FOR TEAM PLAYERS
Winning is the Goal.
Listen and share ideas.
Reach decisions by consensus.
Support your team members.
Give/ get positive feedback to encourage
best performance.
R E S E A R C H
24 OCLC Newsletter November/ December 2001
by Diane Vizine- Goetz
In April of 2000, Joan Mitchell— executive
director, OCLC Forest Press, and editor in chief,
Dewey Decimal classification— and I proposed
a research agenda for classification. We identified
five broad areas in which research and develop-ment
can accelerate the transformation of
existing knowledge- organization schemes into
tools capable of meeting new and emerging
needs:
• Scheme development
• Alternative structures
• Tools and rules for application
• Automatic classification
• New uses of classification systems.
The DDC has been continuously updated and
developed for more than 125 years, and, recently,
vocabulary mapping has been used to enrich the
scheme with new terminology. With each new
electronic tool, the underlying database has been
expanded and improved. We can now generate
versions of the DDC that include many of the
improvements that have resulted from the devel-opment
of the scheme and its transformation into
new application tools, for example, class hierar-chies,
translation information, mapped terminol-ogy,
and additional markup. These enhanced
versions are being used in a range
of projects that are exploring new
uses and applications of Dewey.
This article describes four pro-jects
that use the DDC in new and
innovative ways: Renardus, the
European Union project whose goal
is to provide users with integrated
access to subject gateways and
other Internet- based, distributed
services; the cooperative project
between the Library of Congress
( LC) and OCLC to develop a proto-type
for a new reference service
based on the Collaborative Digital
Reference Service ( CDRS) pilot; and
two OCLC Office of Research
projects that are exploring new
approaches to browsing, navigation and the dis-play
of results sets.
Renardus
Renardus is a collaborative project to develop a
web- based service to enable searching and brows-ing
across a range of European subject gateways.
Renardus is funded by the European Commission
as part of the Information Society Technologies
Programme, part of the European Union’s 5th
Framework Programme. Project partners are
drawn from European library and other informa-tion-
related communities and include national
libraries, research centers and subject gateway
services from Denmark, Finland, Germany, the
Netherlands, Sweden and the U. K. A version of
the DDC, enhanced with complete hierarchies
and mapped vocabulary, is being used to provide
a browsing structure and common switching lan-guage
for the different classification schemes used
by the project partners. The browsing structure
will be offered in English initially and later in
some of the languages of the DDC translations
( e. g., French and German). The project will for-mulate
recommendations for subject access in
gateways and provide guidance on mapping.
Dewey Research: New uses for the DDC
R E S E A R C H
OCLC Newsletter November/ December 2001 25
DDC in the Collaborative Digital Reference
Service ( CDRS)
The Library of Congress and OCLC are cooper-ating
in the development of a prototype to
support a new reference service based on the
CDRS pilot, begun in early 2000 by LC and
16 participating libraries. The goal of CDRS is
to provide professional reference service to
researchers anytime, anywhere, through an inter-national,
digital network of libraries and related
institutions. As a prerequisite to participation,
a candidate member is required to complete a
profile that describes the organization and the
collection it will use to provide reference service
through CDRS. The collection is characterized
by language, geographic coverage, for-mat
and subject area. Currently, the
Library of Congress Classification ( LCC)
is used to describe subject strength. In a
joint effort, Dewey editorial staff mem-bers
and OCLC researchers are working
on mapping LCC and DDC classes.
These mappings will allow libraries
using the DDC to profile themselves by
Dewey and provide a mechanism for
LCC and DDC libraries to interoperate
more easily within the CDRS.
OverView ( Information Visualization
using Dewey)
Can a classification scheme be used to
support browsing and navigation? In
the OverView project in OCLC’s Office
of Research, Lorraine Normore and
Mark Bendig have been looking into ways of sum-marizing
the results of queries against text data-bases,
creating graphical representations
that provide information to the searcher
about the results, and providing a way for
users to navigate in the information
space.
The DDC contains a particularly well-developed
set of hierarchies, an easy to
use notation and a rich set of associated
terminology. These characteristics have
allowed it to be used to define an infor-mation
space for search results. The hier-archical
structure and its systematic
notation provide a mechanism for allowing the
user to see instantly how information is distrib-uted
into conceptual categories defined by the
classification and enables a systematic way to sup-port
navigating from general to specific in the
space. The richly associated terminology enables
the tool to provide information about each loca-tion
in the space on demand. The resulting visual-ization
suggests that new tools that support the
exploration of information spaces can be built to
benefit from generations of work done by classifi-cation
theorists.
R E S E A R C H
26 OCLC Newsletter November/ December 2001
Collaborative Digital Reference Service ( CDRS)
< http:// www. oclc. org/ strategy/ reference/ cdrs/
index. shtm>
Koch, Traugott, Heike Neuroth, and Michael
Day. “ Renardus: Cross- browsing European
subject gateways via a common classification
system ( DDC).” In papers presented at an
IFLA Satellite Meeting sponsored by the IFLA
Section on Classification and Indexing &
IFLA Section on Information Technology,
OCLC Dublin, Ohio, USA, 14– 16 Aug. 2001.
Mitchell, Joan S. and Diane Vizine- Goetz.
“ Millennium Project Research Agenda:
Cataloging and Classification.” Library
Quarterly 70 ( 2) April 2000: ix– xx. An
expanded version is available at:
< http:// www. oclc. org/ dewey/ research/
research_ agenda. htm>
Normore, Lorraine F. and Mark Bendig. Using a
classification- based information space. In:
New Paradigms in Information Visualization
and Manipulation, edited by C. Shaw. To be
published by ACM Press, 2001.
Renardus. < http:// www. renardus. org/>
Vizine- Goetz, Diane and Roger Thompson.
“ Toward DDC- Classified displays of NetFirst
search results.” In papers presented at an
IFLA Satellite Meeting sponsored by the IFLA
Section on Classification and Indexing &
IFLA Section on Information Technology,
OCLC Dublin, Ohio, USA, 14– 16 Aug. 2001.
• • •
Further Reading
NetFirst Results Categorized
by Dewey
In a separate project, Roger
Thompson, consulting systems
analyst, OCLC Office of Research,
and I are exploring how Dewey
can be used to categorize NetFirst
search results. NetFirst, an OCLC
database of electronic resources
available in the FirstSearch service,
is an ideal database for
experimenting with categorized
results sets since all records in the
database contain class numbers
and high- level DDC captions.
Research has shown that
categorized displays enable users
to analyze search results more
quickly than when list- type
displays are used. High- level
characterizations of results sets by
DDC classes can provide context
for the retrieved set, criteria for search
refinement, and a means for accessing Dewey
hierarchies to browse broader and narrower
categories.— Diane Vizine- Goetz is consulting
research scientist, OCLC Office of Research.
• • •
D E W E Y T U R N S 1 2 5
OCLC Newsletter November/ December 2001 27
by Joan S. Mitchell
It is hard to imagine what
Melvil Dewey would think of
the classification system that
bears his name on the 125th
anniversary of the first edi-tion.
The Dewey Decimal
Classification system was
first published in 1876 in
Amherst, Massachusetts, a
sleepy college town in the Western part of the
state. As a student and then a librarian at Amherst
College, Dewey developed the system as an effi-cient
shelf- arrangement device for books. If Dewey
were to look at his system today, he would certainly
recognize the top levels— the basic structure and
the main classes have remained remarkably intact.
What has changed in the system is its expansion in
breadth and depth well beyond the three digits of
the first edition, its hospitality to an ever- growing
diversity of topics, its worldwide adoption, its avail-ability
in many languages, and its use well beyond
that of a simple shelf arrangement tool. Today, the
Dewey Decimal Classification is the most widely
used library classification scheme in the world, and
is employed as a knowledge organization tool for
everything from books to web resources.
Dewey is used by 200,000 libraries in 135
countries. National bibliographies of 60 coun-tries
are organized by the DDC; 17 countries in
Africa, 13 countries in the Americas/ Caribbean
region, eight countries in Europe, seven countries
in the Middle East, and 15 countries in the Asia-
Pacific region use the DDC for this purpose. Just
last year, the National Library of Switzerland
became the 60th national bibliographic agency to
use the DDC to organize its national bibliography.
Over the course of its lifetime, Dewey has been
translated into 30 languages. During the past 12
months, the Italian, Russian and Spanish transla-tions
of DDC 21 have been published, joining the
French translation published in 1998. Arabic and
French abridged editions have been published,
and the Arabic translation of DDC 21 is expected
to be completed at the end of this year. The first
Greek translation of Dewey will be published in
November, and Norwegian and Icelandic transla-tions
are near completion. We are in active discus-sions
with the national libraries of Germany and
Vietnam about the first translations of the DDC
into those languages. In addition, we are explor-ing
web versions of the DDC with our French,
German and Norwegian translation partners.
Another key feature of the DDC is its meaning-ful
notation. Dewey uses familiar Arabic notation
to represent concepts across the classification.
For example, notation 94 represents Australia
throughout the DDC:
One of the great strengths of Dewey is that its
controlled vocabulary, the notation, usually
remains the same in translation. At right are the
Dewey number and caption for computer pro-gramming
in the English, French, Italian, Russian
and Spanish translations of DDC 21. In each edi-tion,
005.1 has the same meaning, but the caption
appears in the language of the translation.
Internet in Australia 004.6780994
Animals of Australia 591.994
History of Australia 994
Dewey Decimal Classification: 125 and still growing
D E W E Y T U R N S 1 2 5
28 OCLC Newsletter November/ December 2001
The continuous development of the DDC over
the last 125 years has resulted in three key features
that distinguish it from many of the new knowl-edge-
organization tools that have appeared on the
web: well- defined categories, well- developed hier-archies,
and a rich network of relationships.
In this example, the hierarchy provides context
to “ fields” as a mathematical concept ( as opposed,
for example, to fields in agriculture or physics).
The record contains notes that further define the
category and relate the category to other con-cepts
in mathematics.
Perhaps the most important feature of the DDC
is that it has been developed and updated continu-ously
for the last 125 years by a team of editors,
and with the ongoing advice of our 10- member
international advisory committee— the Decimal
Classification Editorial Policy Committee ( EPC).
We expect to publish a new print version of the
full edition, DDC 22, in June 2003. Publication of
Abridged Edition 14 will follow in January 2004.
We keep the Classification up to date continuously
through postings on our web site and through reg-ular
releases of our electronic versions.
Every other week, we post new Library of
Congress subject headings accompanied by
Dewey numbers on the Dewey web site. On the
first day of each month, we also post selected
new and changed DDC entries. These services
provide classification advice on topics of interest
in advance of their announcement in the elec-tronic
versions of the DDC.
We use the electronic versions of the DDC as
our chief updating mechanism. Dewey was the
first library classification scheme available in elec-tronic
form, starting with Electronic Dewey in
1993 and then Dewey for Windows in 1996. In
2000, we introduced WebDewey in CORC, a web
version of the DDC. In January 2002, we will
expand the availability of WebDewey to all
libraries. We will also introduce a web version
of the abridged edition early next year.
One of our key strategies in updating and
improving the DDC is vocabulary mapping.
The DDC editors, the OCLC Office of Research
and our outside partners are involved in this
effort. The Dewey editors map selected new
Library of Congress subject headings to Dewey
numbers on a regular basis. The OCLC Office of
Research has developed statistical techniques to
derive subject heading mappings to Dewey num-bers
from WorldCat. The new abridged web ver-sion
will also include mapped vocabulary from
the Sears List of Subject Headings under a licens-ing
agreement with H. W. Wilson.
500 Science
510 Mathematics
512 Algebra, number theory
512.3 Fields
Class here field theory,
Galois theory
Class linear algebra in 512.5;
class number theory in 512.7
125 years of proving “ ever more widely useful”
1911– 7th Edition
published, first to have
Forest Press imprint
1885– 2nd Edition
published under Melvil
Dewey’s name
1900– 1st Abridged
Edition published
1916– First ALA advisory
committee, the Decimal
Classification Advisory
Committee, appointed
1876– A Classification and Subject Index
for Cataloguing and Arranging Books and
Pamphlets of a Library ... the first edition of
Dewey Decimal Classification, published
anonymously in Amherst, Massachusetts
1876– A Classification and Subject index
for Cataloguing and Arranging Books and
Pamphlets of a Library… the first edition of the
Dewey Decimal Classification, published
anonymously in Amherst, Massachusetts
D E W E Y T U R N S 1 2 5
OCLC Newsletter November/ December 2001 29
Dewey is not just a library classification sys-tem;
it is a general knowledge- organization tool.
Melvil Dewey set out 125 years ago to provide a
better system of organization for the information
inside library walls. Today, libraries have an infor-mation
challenge that goes beyond the bricks and
mortar of individual institutions. Libraries need
to provide access cooperatively to information
that is local, regional, national and global in
nature. Dewey is a lingua franca in the global
information space.
Through continuous updating, mapping of
other vocabularies, and translations into multiple
languages, we have nurtured and expanded the
DDC into an unparalleled global knowledge-organization
resource. Dewey is already being
explored as the underlying browsing structure in
the Renardus project, which links subject gateways
across Europe. We have worked with the National
Library of New Zealand to reflect the primary
school curriculum in subject headings associated
with Dewey. The Colorado Digitization Project is
studying Dewey as a browsing structure across
diverse information providers— libraries of all
kinds, museums and historical societies. And here
at OCLC, the Office of Research is involved in a
number of projects focused on expanding the
terminology base in Dewey, improving automatic
classification techniques, and developing Dewey
as a browsing tool for the electronic information
environment. Surely, it seems that Melvil Dewey’s
scheme has held up well these last 125 years and is
prepared to meet evolving knowledge- organization
needs.— Joan S. Mitchell is executive director,
OCLC Forest Press, and editor in chief, Dewey
Decimal Classification.
• • •
The Decimal Classification Editorial Policy
Committee ( EPC) is a 10- member interna-tional
board whose main function is to
advise OCLC Forest Press on matters relat-ing
to changes, innovations and the general
development of the DDC. The committee
reviews every update to the DDC during
semi- annual meetings at the Library of
Congress and electronically between meet-ings.
EPC includes official representatives
of the American Library Association, the
Library Association ( United Kingdom), and
the Library of Congress. Current members
hail from academic, public, special and
national libraries and library schools in
Australia, Canada, the United Kingdom and
the United States. Andrea Stamm
( Northwestern University) is chair of EPC;
Lucy Evans ( British Library) is vice- chair.
• • •
Decimal Classification Editorial Policy Committee
1930– Library of Congress
began printing Dewey
numbers on catalog cards
1931– Melvil Dewey
dies Dec. 10
1953– Decimal Classification
Editorial Policy Committee
reconstituted to represent ALA,
Forest Press and the Library of
Congress to guide the editorial
development of the DDC
1923– DDC
editorial office
moved to the
Library of
Congress
1958– 16th Edition
published, first to be edited
under agreement between
the Library of Congress
and Forest Press
1937– Decimal Classification
Committee, a forerunner to
the present Decimal
Classification Editorial Policy
Committee, established
30 OCLC Newsletter November/ December 2001
In 1924, when Melvil Dewey transferred
the copyrights for the DDC to Forest Press,
he expressed the hope that it would
be made “ ever more widely useful.”
I would like to thank and acknowledge the
generations of editors and librarians who
have continued to make the DDC a dynamic,
living classification tool.
I would also like to congratulate Joan Mitchell
and the current editorial staff on this anniversary.
Thank you, Joan, for your leadership and
dedication to making the DDC “ ever more widely
useful.” Melvil Dewey would be proud.
— Jay Jordan
D E W E Y T U R N S 1 2 5
Dewey’s 125th anniversary
celebrated at IFLA
During the International Federation of Library
Associations and Institutions ( IFLA) annual con-ference
in August, nearly 200 delegates from six
continents gathered on the skywalk of the
Prudential Center in Boston to commemorate
the 125th anniversary of the publication of the
DDC. Attendees included national librarians,
translation partners, and officials from IFLA and
other library associations. Following opening
remarks by Joan Mitchell, executive director,
OCLC Forest Press, Winston Tabb, associate
librarian of Congress for Library Services, Library
of Congress, spoke about the special relation-ship
between the Library of Congress and
Dewey. Jay Jordan, OCLC president and CEO,
closed with observations on Dewey’s future and
a toast to 125 years of the DDC.
Christine Deschamps, IFLA and OCLC Board of Trustees, and
Jay Jordan, OCLC
D E W E Y T U R N S 1 2 5
OCLC Newsletter November/ December 2001 31
Wanda Dole,
Washburn
University; Phyllis
Spies, OCLC
Worldwide
Library Services;
and Ralph
Manning,
National Library
of Canada
Marie- France Plassard, IFLA Universal Bibliographic Control and
International MARC Programme; Olayemi Omolayole, National Library of
Nigeria; Joan Mitchell, OCLC Forest Press; and Patrice Landry, Swiss
National Library
photos by Photo Atlantic
Lynne Brindley, British Library, and Meg Bellinger,
OCLC Digital and Preservation Resources
Willy van der Pijpen, Royal Library of Belgium; Regina Varniene,
National Library of Lithuania; and Nick Rawson, OCLC Europe,
the Middle East & Africa
Octavio Rojas, Infoenlace Ltda. ( Colombia,
Ecuador and Peru) and Nancy London,
OCLC Library Services
D E W E Y T U R N S 1 2 5
32 OCLC Newsletter November/ December 2001
by Winston Tabb
The Library of Congress’ relationship with the
Dewey Decimal Classification reaches back
through more than 100 years of the classifi-cation’s
125- year history. In a real sense, this rela-tionship
predates the library’s extended courtship
with its own classification, the LCC, which owes
its very existence to Melvil Dewey. And to his
firmness in declining to modify the sixth edition
of the DDC in 1899, when Charles Martel and
James Hanson, the library’s cataloging and classifi-cation
activists of that era, requested him to
expand and revise it considerably— within one
year’s time— for the library’s use. Upon Dewey’s
refusal, the library launched its own efforts to
arrange the world of knowledge and books, not
from 000 to 999, but from A to Z. In government
fashion, Z, of course, was finished first ( about
1910), and we have yet to complete the final sub-class
of Class K for religious law— though I assure
you we are close. So what Mr. Dewey declined to
do within one year has taken the library more
than one century to accomplish!
There were no hard feelings over the Dewey
rejection— or if so they evaporated fairly quickly,
for the Dewey editorial office found a home in
the library in 1923, since which time there has
been a continuous Dewey physical presence
under our roof. Dewey and his followers recog-nized
this truth about building, maintaining and
refreshing a comprehensive classification scheme;
to do so one must be surrounded, engulfed,
awash in a sea of books. What better describes
the Library of Congress of the time, when the vig-orous
Herbert Putnam was adding to our collec-tions
at unprecedented rates. Having access to all
those books was the key to keeping the DDC rele-vant
and rejuvenated on a regular basis.
For seven years the Dewey presence at the
library was strictly an editorial one: in essence
space was rented to further production of new
editions of the DDC. In 1930, at the request of
the library’s Card Division— which was seeking
ways to provide “ added value” to its by- then long-established
business of sharing the library’s cata-loging
with the outside world via printed
cards— the assignment of Dewey numbers was
undertaken. From small beginnings focused on
English language materials only, this aspect of
The Library of Congress and the DDC
Winston Tabb, associate librarian of Congress for Library Services, Library of
Congress, delivered this address on Aug. 21 at a reception celebrating the 125th
anniversary of the DDC during the International Federation of Library Associations
and Institutions Conference in Boston, Massachusetts.
1988– Forest
Press becomes
part of OCLC
2002– WebDewey and
Abridged WebDewey
planned for release
1996– 21st Edition and Dewey for
Windows published, first edition to
be published simultaneously in both
print and electronic formats
1993– Electronic Dewey
published, first library
classification scheme in
electronic form
2000– WebDewey
in CORC released
1999– Forest Press office moved
from Albany, New York, to OCLC
headquarters in Dublin, Ohio
D E W E Y T U R N S 1 2 5
OCLC Newsletter November/ December 2001 33
Dewey work has gradually grown to the point
that about 110,000 bibliographic records now
receive Dewey assignments each year. That rep-resents
about two- thirds of our “ full cataloging”
output. Every Cataloging- in- Publication title
includes Dewey information— this in itself
accounts for nearly 60,000 titles per year— and
the remainder includes titles in English, Spanish,
French, German, Italian and Portuguese. The
numbers assigned represent the standard of
authoritative Dewey classifying; and the dissemi-nation
of these authoritative numbers to the
worldwide Dewey community has certainly been
a major factor in maintaining Dewey’s well-earned
position as the world’s most used library
classification system.
Back to very brief history. The ’ 30s, ’ 40s and
early ’ 50s were not always easy years in the
Dewey/ LC life cycle. Several controversial editions
embroiled all the parties in complex maneuvers to
find the right direction. Editors came and went
quickly. The Librarian of Congress himself was
sometimes a participant in this drama. In 1953 the
Lake Placid Education Foundation and the Library
of Congress agreed that the editorial responsibility
for producing the DDC would lie with the library.
David Haykin became the first “ LC” editor, but after
one unsatisfactory edition he resigned and in 1956
was replaced by Benjamin Custer.
“ Mister Custer” as he is remembered affection-ately
by the several staff still on active Dewey
duty who worked for him, was the much- needed
pacifier and consolidator who guided Dewey
work at the library for the next 25 years while
fathering DDC editions 16, 17, 18 and 19. The
Decimal Classification Division was created when
he took the reins, and the structure of this divi-sion
( whose mission statement, succinct and to
the point, reads: to develop, apply, and assist in
the use of the Dewey Decimal Classification) has
remained unchanged to this day— not even being
affected by the reorganization of the rest of our
Cataloging Directorate in the early 1990s.
The great change of the 1990s was, to be sure,
a reversion to the original pattern: the editorship
of the DDC no longer to lie with the library, but
rather with the classification’s owners. Following
Editor John Comaromi’s death in 1991, the library
could not refill this position— nor in fact could it
fill any position at all— the result of a court-ordered
moratorium as part of the settlement of
litigation involving the library’s hiring practices.
Both LC and OCLC recognized the impossibility
of proceeding without an editor for an undeter-mined
period, and the result of our discussions is
well known to all: the editor to be an OCLC
employee, not an LC employee.
Joan Mitchell’s assumption of the editorship
could have led to philosophical, organizational
and operational difficulties, but it did none of
those things. Our two organizations responded to
the new setup with ease, principally because Joan
proved to be that rare bird in Dewey’s editorial
history: someone remarkably easy with whom to
work. When she also assumed the role of execu-tive
director of OCLC Forest Press, replacing that
courtly, able and eminently reasonable gentleman,
Peter Paulson, it simplified further our dealings
with OCLC, though I am sure it increased her
own workload far beyond her expectations. In
any case, with OCLC funding the Decimal
Classification Division’s editorial team ( Julianne
Beall, Winton Matthews and Gregory New are pre-sent
this evening), and with Joan setting the
agenda, we have continued to build the DDC
toward the next Dewey milestone: publication of
DDC Edition 22 in 2003.
Though this recapitulation oversimplifies the
many years of the library’s involvement with the
Dewey Decimal Classification, I think it makes
clear how intimate the relationship has been.
From our role as rejected suitor to that of co-conspirator,
we have been a commanding pres-ence
in the adult life cycle of the Dewey Decimal
Classification. On the 125th anniversary of the
DDC, I salute it and the library’s thread woven so
deeply into its fabric.
• • •
Winston Tabb, Library of Congress; Joan Mitchell, OCLC Forest
Press; and Jay Jordan, OCLC, at the DDC 125th anniversary
reception
Photo Atlantic
D E W E Y T U R N S 1 2 5
34 OCLC Newsletter November/ December 2001
by Dawn Lawson
In the eight years since
1993, when the Dewey
Decimal Classification
became the first classifica-tion
system available in elec-tronic
form to users, it has
had to undergo several
metamorphoses to keep
pace with the rapidly chang-ing
world of hardware and software. The original
MS- DOS- based 5.25- inch floppy disk ( remember
those?),“ Electronic Dewey,” became “ Dewey for
Windows” software, offered on a 16- bit Windows
3.1- compatible CD- ROM. Dewey for Windows
was made compatible with subsequent versions
of Windows. July 2000 marked the debut of
WebDewey in CORC, a browser- based version of
the DDC available only to OCLC cataloging mem-bers.
The next major changes are set for early
2002.
January will see the release of a significantly
enhanced version of WebDewey in CORC, under
a new name, WebDewey ( OCLC Cataloging
Services Edition). At the same time we will be
launching a new service, called simply
WebDewey, which will be available to all libraries,
regardless of OCLC cataloging membership
status. Both will be based on the same database,
and the interfaces will be identical as well.
Production of the Dewey for Windows CD- ROM
will cease at the same time.
The DDC 21 database provides the content for
both editions of WebDewey. The database con-tains
everything from the print Edition 21 of the
Dewey Decimal Classification, as well as the many
significant editorial changes that have been made
to that material since its publication in four
bound volumes in 1996.
In addition, the database includes a large num-ber
of Library of Congress Subject Headings
( LCSH) that have been mapped to Dewey num-bers
in two ways: intellectually and statistically.
The intellectual mappings are done by the Dewey
editorial staff, who keep an eye on LC Subject
Headings Weekly Lists for new subject headings
of interest and select Dewey numbers to associate
with them. Recent new intellectual mappings
have included such LCSH as digital signatures
( 005.82) and Dogbert ( 741.5973). Intellectual
mappings come into the
database via routes other
than the weekly lists as
well. The editors map
selected LC subject head-ings
during the course of
editing and updating
Dewey schedules. The
January 2002 release of
WebDewey will also
include many intellectual
mappings from People,
Places & Things, a hot- off-the-
press print publication
from Forest Press, consist-ing
of some 50,000 popular
Library of Congress Subject
Headings mapped to
Dewey numbers.
The statistical mappings
derive from work done in
the OCLC Office of
Research under the direc-tion
of Diane Vizine- Goetz.
For nearly a decade, she
and her staff have been
fine- tuning algorithms that
they then apply to WorldCat
You’ve come a long way, Dewey!
A WebDewey record
D E W E Y T U R N S 1 2 5
OCLC Newsletter November/ December 2001 35
to derive the most frequently used LCSH- DDC
number pairs. January’s WebDewey releases will
feature statistical mappings based on their most
recently refined algorithm.
Two additional members will join the
WebDewey family of products in early 2002:
Abridged WebDewey ( OCLC Cataloging Services
Edition) and Abridged WebDewey. The debut of
these two products marks the first time that an
abridged edition of the classification has been
available to its users in electronic form. The rela-tionships
between these two products will be
analogous to those of the WebDewey products.
Abridged WebDewey ( OCLC Cataloging Services
Edition) will be available to cataloging members
within the CORC environment, and Abridged
WebDewey, based on the same database and with
an identical interface, will be available to all
libraries, regardless of OCLC cataloging member-ship
status, in a separate environment.
These two products will be based on the
enhanced Abridged Edition 13 database, which
has the contents of the one- volume print edition,
published in 1997, all editorial updates, intellectu-ally
mapped LCSH, and mappings between
abridged Dewey numbers and the latest edition of
H. W. Wilson’s Sears List of Subject Headings.
Statistically mapped LCSH will be added in the
future. Some of the intellectual mappings in
Abridged WebDewey come from Subject
Headings for Children, an OCLC Forest Press
print publication listing associations between
abridged Dewey numbers and LCSH most fre-quently
applied to children’s materials.
All web versions of the DDC are updated quar-terly
in terms of content and functionality. While
adapting and changing the electronic versions of
the classification to keep pace with hardware and
software innovations, OCLC Forest Press has also
maintained a steady dialogue with users over the
years and implemented many of the enhancement
requests they have received in the course of such
dialogue. One request was to give users the abil-ity
to annotate electronic versions to reflect local
classification practices. This feature was imple-mented
in Dewey for Windows and expanded sig-nificantly
over time. It is also coming to all the
web versions in 2002.
One early venue for dialogue with users, the
Electronic Dewey user group meetings, eventually
became the Dewey Update Breakfast. Held at the
American Library Association meetings and other
major conferences, the breakfast update covers
Forest Press activities and includes a segment on
the latest developments on the electronic product
front. The subsequent question- and- answer ses-sion
is one way the Dewey editorial team and
OCLC development staff learn what enhance-ments
users would like to see the soonest.
Smaller focus group meetings are also held at ALA
and other conferences. Additional user feedback
is obtained when training workshops are held by
the OCLC regional service providers.
The quarterly updates made to the WebDewey
services provide the shortest timeframe to date in
which to implement user- driven functionality
enhancements. This rapid give- and- take between
users and OCLC staff is gratifying for both sides,
and with the introduction of the various new web
versions next year, it is likely to become richer
and more mutually beneficial than ever.— Dawn
Lawson is senior electronic products manager,
OCLC Forest Press.
• • •
An LC authority record
D E W E Y T U R N S 1 2 5
36 OCLC Newsletter November/ December 2001
by Libbie Crawford
People, Places & Things is
designed to help library
users find the right places
to browse for information
organized by the Dewey
Decimal Classification
( DDC) system. The 422-
page publication provides a
list of over 50,000 Library of
Congress Subject Headings ( LCSH) paired with
corresponding DDC numbers. The list of head-ings
includes personal, corporate- body and geo-graphic
names; and topical and title headings.
People, Places & Things is based on the previ-ous
experience using records from WorldCat in
developing the two editions of Subject Headings
for Children. An additional source is the research
done by Chan and Vizine- Goetz on the correlation
between frequency of subject use and validity
[ Lois Mai Chan and Diane Vizine- Goetz. 1998.
Toward a Computer— Generated Subject Valida-tion
File: Feasibility and Usefulness. Library
Resources & Technical Services: 42: 45- 60].
In developing People Places & Things, the edi-tors
identified WorldCat records with DDC num-bers
( MARC tag 082) and subject headings ( MARC
tags 600- 651) assigned by the Library of Congress
( LC). The DDC number and the first LCSH were
extracted from each record. The editors then
applied a term co- occurrence measure to identify
candidate pairs. Frequency counts were used to
restrict the candidate pairs to those with headings
that had been used at least five times.
Data files were prepared with the LCSH, the
Dewey number, the DDC Relative Index entry
closest to the LCSH, and the caption associated
with the DDC number. In addition to the heading-number
pairs derived from WorldCat records,
heading- number pairs were added from other
sources. These included editorially mapped head-ings
from WebDewey, headings from Subject
Headings for Children, and headings used in
the OCLC NetFirst database, all accompanied by
Dewey numbers. The resulting list contained
over 50,000 headings and the DDC number or
numbers most frequently associated with each
heading.
The heading- number pairs were then labeled
to indicate which ones needed further review. If
the heading and its corresponding number were
exactly the same as the heading and correspond-ing
number in the DDC Relative Index or the edi-torially
mapped heading and its corresponding
number in the WebDewey database, the entry was
labeled as approved. Heading- number pairs from
Subject Headings for Children and NetFirst head-ings
were labeled as provisionally approved.
Headings paired with invalid numbers from old
editions of the DDC were flagged.
The list was sorted in DDC number order and
divided by subject area, and then given to the edi-tor
with expertise in each area. The subject head-ings
and classification numbers were edited for
accuracy and currency. When forms, time peri-ods,
places or other subdivisions were included in
the subject headings, either the Dewey numbers
were adjusted to reflect those subdivisions or
additional Dewey numbers were added.
Consistent policies were followed in determining
which numbers would be assigned to certain kinds
of headings, e. g., a social group received a number
both in 305 and in 930- 990. When an LCSH with a
subheading was in the list but the LCSH without
the subheading was not, the missing LCSH was
usually added. Questions were resolved by con-sultation
with the other editors.
People, Places & Things introduced
People, Places & Things: A List of
Popular Library of Congress Subject
Headings with Dewey Numbers.
2001. 422p. Paper. ISBN 0- 910608- 69- 5.
People, Places & Things may be
ordered from the Forest Press web site
< http:// www. oclc. org/ fp/>.
D E W E Y T U R N S 1 2 5
OCLC Newsletter November/ December 2001 37
The combined list was then checked from
A to Z for consistency. Two additional sources
of headings were added to the list during the final
stage. First, nearly 2,500 selected headings with
high frequency of use in WorldCat in popular
areas such as history, literature and music were
added to the file with Dewey numbers assigned
by the Dewey editors. Second, headings that had
been selected by the editors from the LC Subject
Headings Weekly Lists and added to WebDewey
since the original merge were added to the file.
Because the preferred version of a subject head-ing
can change over time ( e. g., the form “ Afro-
American” was changed to “ African American”
during the editing stage), all headings were
verified for currency. The Dewey numbers associ-ated
with any changed headings were reviewed.
People, Places & Things reflects current LC and
Dewey practice through April 2001.
People, Places & Things guides information
seekers to Dewey numbers that are often assigned
in conjunction with certain subject headings.
Additionally, People, Places & Things can assist
classifiers in application of the DDC. It also is a
source of vocabulary enhancement to the DDC
database. OCLC Forest Press expects to include
many of these subject heading mappings in a
future release of WebDewey.— Libbie Crawford
is marketing manager, OCLC Forest Press.
• • •
P R O D U C T N E W S
38 OCLC Newsletter November/ December 2001
OCLC has enhanced WorldCat on the OCLC
FirstSearch service by adding expanded search
options and descriptive content to help users
more easily identify materials.
New icons on the search and results screens
indicate the physical format of materials in the
records. These improvements increase visibility
for the wide variety of resources OCLC member
libraries have collected and cataloged in
WorldCat.
The addition of icons representing the major
physical formats in WorldCat as search limiters
will help users more easily target searches to
materials in particular formats, such as books or
video tapes. More detailed format information in
search results will enable easy identification of
the most relevant items in results lists.
OCLC is also adding tables of contents, cover
art, book summaries and notes about authors to
bibliographic records for current popular material.
Users can find these new features on a full record
display. This descriptive content in WorldCat is
provided by Ingram Library Services, one of the
world’s largest book and video distributors.
Users may also search for a particular language
using a list of the 30 most common languages in
WorldCat or the full list of more than 400
languages present in the database. In addition,
users can now pinpoint items in WorldCat that
are held in their own local libraries.
“ By responding to requests from our users,
OCLC is making WorldCat easier to use and more
valuable to libraries,” said Frank Hermes, vice
president, OCLC Marketing and Planning. “ OCLC
supports the position of libraries as premier
information providers by providing their users
with better and more intuitive tools to find what
they are looking for. These enhancements to
FirstSearch will help users identify and focus on
the best resources in their search for
information.”
The OCLC FirstSearch service is designed for
librarians and library users and accommodates
expert and novice searchers alike. FirstSearch
provides access to more than 70 databases includ-ing
the OCLC FirstSearch Electronic Collections
Online service. Most databases show library hold-ings
from WorldCat ( the OCLC Online Union
Catalog) to point users to resources in their
library’s own collections. FirstSearch came online
in 1991. More information about FirstSearch,
including a guided tour, is available on OCLC’s
web site < http:// www. oclc. org/ firstsearch/>.
• • •
OCLC announces enhancements
to WorldCat in FirstSearch
P R O D U C T N E W S
OCLC Newsletter November/ December 2001 39
OCLC has combined the OCLC ArticleFirst data-base
with the OCLC ContentsFirst database and
added bibliographic records from the OCLC
FirstSearch Electronic Collections Online service.
The enhanced ArticleFirst database, available via
the OCLC FirstSearch service, is now a single
serials- content resource for libraries and their
users.
Library staff and users can now browse journal
tables of contents in ArticleFirst, as they do in the
Electronic Collections Online database. Clicking
on the Browse Journals and Magazines link
within the FirstSearch search interface allows
them to view tables of contents for individual
periodicals.
Enhancements to OCLC ArticleFirst promote better
browsing, streamlined searching
Click on the Browse Journals and
Magazines link to navigate to the
tables of contents.
Click on a title in the alphabetic list
to go to its journal information
page. Click on the Current Issue
link to jump to the table of
contents.
P R O D U C